Toward Better Response Assessment of Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Report from the National

Alina Markova1, Stephanie J Lee2, Badri Modi3

  • 1Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

PubMed

Insights

New criteria improve skin assessments for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Refinements enhance accuracy and clinical relevance for clinical trials and patient care in this challenging condition.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Dermatology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) affects approximately 50% of patients post-transplant, with cutaneous manifestations posing significant evaluation challenges.
  • Existing National Institutes of Health (NIH) response criteria for skin cGVHD have limitations in sensitivity for detecting clinically meaningful changes, especially with severe sclerotic skin involvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine existing NIH skin response criteria for chronic GVHD to improve accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical relevance in trial settings.
  • To address the heterogeneity and difficulty in evaluating cutaneous manifestations of cGVHD, particularly sclerotic skin involvement.

Main Methods:

  • The NIH Consensus Skin Task Force reviewed current diagnosis and scoring methods for skin cGVHD.
  • Proposed refinements include separate body surface area (BSA) assessments for epidermal and sclerotic features, modified sclerosis descriptors, and introduction of new clinician-reported outcome instruments.
  • New instruments include the Sclerosis Quality and Physical Signs (SQPS) scale and the Sclerosis Daily Function Impact (SDFI) scale.

Main Results:

  • Current NIH scoring using BSA and sclerosis features scales lacks sensitivity to clinically meaningful changes.
  • Proposed modifications aim to enhance the assessment of epidermal involvement and sclerotic features, including edema and ulceration.
  • The new SQPS and SDFI scales are designed to capture qualitative physical changes and functional compromise more effectively.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed refinements to the NIH skin response criteria are expected to improve the accuracy and clinical relevance of cGVHD assessments.
  • These enhanced measures will strengthen endpoints in clinical trials and ultimately improve patient care for individuals with skin manifestations of cGVHD.
  • Future directions involve incorporating patient-reported outcomes, novel technologies, and biomarker research into cGVHD skin assessments.