Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

44.0K
Overview
44.0K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

22.4K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
22.4K
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

13.2K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
13.2K
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

11.9K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
11.9K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

15.4K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
15.4K
Poisson Probability Distribution01:09

Poisson Probability Distribution

11.7K
A Poisson probability distribution is a discrete probability distribution. It gives the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events happen at a known average rate and independently of the time since the last event. For example, a book editor might be interested in the number of words spelled incorrectly in a particular book. It might be that, on average, there are five words spelled incorrectly in 100 pages. The interval is 100 pages.
The...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Language learning in canines and toddlers: Shared origins?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Language Access is a Catalyst for Early Numerical Abilities.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

ManyNumbers 3: A Multi-Lab Study of Demographic Correlates of Early Number Knowledge.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Special days for one group inform children about both mentioned and unmentioned groups.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same author

Cultural Adaptations in Community Health Worker-Delivered Mental Health Interventions for U.S Latine Populations.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2026
Same author

Stress and Anxiety Screening in Caregivers of Children with Pediatric Feeding Disorder.

Clinical child psychology and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Cycling travel vlog characteristics and low-carbon tourism intention: The roles of destination image and environmental self-efficacy.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Predicting occupational burnout among kindergarten teachers: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Immediate and delayed effects of multi-element and points-only gamified mobile apps on EFL learners' engagement in English vocabulary learning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Impacts of pride, envy and guilt on leadership potential: The indirect role of PsyCap.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

AI-Augmented marketing decision-making and competitive performance: A resource-based view of capability orchestration.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

A longitudinal study on the intergenerational transmission mechanism of music preference on adolescents' emotion regulation.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.7K

Probability range and probability distortion in a gambling task.

Chenmu Xing1, Joanna Paul1, Alexandra Zax1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, USA.

Acta Psychologica
|May 17, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adults exhibit consistent probability distortion when making decisions under risk, regardless of the probability range presented. This suggests that reference points do not significantly alter how people perceive small or large probabilities.

Keywords:
Cumulative prospect theoryDecision making under riskNumeracyProbabilityProportion judgment

More Related Videos

Assessment of Open Probability of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in the Setting of Coenzyme Q Excess
07:35

Assessment of Open Probability of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in the Setting of Coenzyme Q Excess

Published on: June 1, 2022

2.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.7K
Assessment of Open Probability of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in the Setting of Coenzyme Q Excess
07:35

Assessment of Open Probability of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in the Setting of Coenzyme Q Excess

Published on: June 1, 2022

2.6K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision science
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Adults often misjudge probabilities in decision-making under risk, showing an inverse S-shaped distortion.
  • This pattern mirrors proportion judgment tasks, where distortions can shift based on reference points.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if probability distortion in decision making under risk is influenced by reference points implied by the probability range.
  • To test if different probability ranges (full, upper, or lower) affect how adults distort probabilities.

Main Methods:

  • Adult participants were divided into three groups: full-range (0-100%), upper-range (50-100%), or lower-range (0-50%).
  • Participants determined certainty equivalents for 176 hypothetical monetary gambles.
  • A modified cumulative prospect theory model was used to analyze probability distortion.

Main Results:

  • Minimal differences in probability distortion were observed across the different probability range conditions.
  • The findings suggest that reference points implied by probability ranges do not significantly alter probability distortion patterns.
  • Robustness of the inverse S-shaped probability distortion was demonstrated across tested contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Probability distortion in decision making under risk appears robust and not significantly influenced by the implied probability range.
  • The study provides evidence against the significant role of range-based reference points in shaping probability distortion.
  • Deviations from the expected distortion pattern were noted across all conditions, indicating areas for future research.