Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone
Published on: September 9, 2020
Consideration for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators differ between specialities
Amar Mistry1,2, Zakariyya Vali3,2, Abu Taher2
1Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK amarmistry@nhs.net.
Insights
Patients managed by cardiologists are more likely to be considered for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. This highlights variations in ICD consideration, impacting patient outcomes and survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation rates for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death are variable.
- Guideline recommendations for ICDs exist but are not uniformly applied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if management by a cardiologist influences consideration for ICD implantation in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
- To evaluate the impact of physician specialty on ICD consideration and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, observational study of 129 patients with severe LVSD identified via echocardiography.
- Patients were categorized into three management groups: electrophysiologist/heart failure specialist, other cardiologists, and non-cardiologists.
- ICD consideration and 1-year survival were assessed cross-sectionally.
Main Results:
- 47.3% of patients with severe LVSD were not considered for an ICD.
- Patients managed by cardiologists were significantly more likely to be considered for an ICD compared to non-cardiologists (63.9% vs. 30.0%).
- Management by an electrophysiologist/heart failure specialist further increased the likelihood of ICD consideration compared to other cardiologists.
Conclusions:
- Physician specialty significantly impacts the consideration of ICD therapy for primary prevention.
- Variations exist among cardiologists and between cardiologists and non-cardiologists in recommending ICDs.
- Optimizing physician awareness and adherence to guidelines may improve ICD utilization for eligible patients.
Purpose:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation rates remain variable despite established guideline recommendations. This study aims to assess whether being managed by a cardiologist has an impact on whether patients are considered for an ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
Design/Methods:
Single-centre, retrospective, observational study of patients identified to have severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) on echocardiography (n = 129) between 1 and 30 June 2016 with cross-sectional assessment at 1 year. An assessment of ICD consideration at 1 year following the echocardiogram was documented, in addition to the specialty of the managing physician (group 1-electrophysiologist/heart failure specialist; group 2-all other cardiologists; group 3-non-cardiologist).
Results:
129/1173 (11%) transthoracic echocardiographies (s) were identified to have severe LVSD. 52 (40%), 37 (29%) and 40 (31%) were managed by group 1, group 2 and group 3, respectively. Mean age was 74.7 (±12.6) years with a predominance of male gender (70.5%). An ICD was not considered in 47.3%. Those managed by a cardiologist were more likely to be considered for an ICD than a non-cardiologist (63.9% vs 30.0%; OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 8.8, p = 0.001) with a greater survival at 1 year (89.9% vs 52.5%, OR 8.1 95% CI 3.2 to 20.4, p < 0.001). Group 1 were more likely to consider ICD than group 2 cardiologists (75.0% vs 45.9%; OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.4 to 8.7, p = 0.005).
Conclusion:
There is significant variation between cardiologists and non-cardiologists, as well as within different cardiology subspecialists, when considering the option of ICD therapy for primary prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
Transmission Line Design Considerations
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow

