Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
Marit Lucas1, Ilaria Jansen2,3, C Dilara Savci-Heijink4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.lucas@amc.uva.nl.
Computer-aided grading using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can accurately detect Gleason patterns (GPs) in prostate biopsies. This automated approach shows substantial agreement with pathologists, potentially improving prostate cancer grading and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Digital pathology
- Computational oncology
- Artificial intelligence in medicine
Background:
- Histopathologic grading of prostate cancer via Gleason patterns (GPs) exhibits significant inter-observer variability.
- This variability can lead to suboptimal patient treatment strategies.
- Digitization of prostate biopsies and whole-slide imaging enable computer-aided grading solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate an automated system for detecting Gleason patterns (GPs) and determining prostate cancer Grade Groups (GG).
- To assess the accuracy and concordance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) based approach for prostate cancer grading.
Main Methods:
- A convolutional neural network (CNN), specifically Inception-v3, was re-trained for automated detection of GP 3 and GP ≥ 4 in digitized prostate biopsies.
- Pixel-level annotations were performed on 96 prostate biopsies from 38 patients.
- The CNN's output was converted into probability maps to determine the GG for the entire biopsy.
Main Results:
- The CNN achieved 92% accuracy in differentiating non-atypical from malignant (GP ≥ 3) areas, with 90% sensitivity and 93% specificity.
- Differentiation between GP ≥ 4 and GP ≤ 3 areas yielded 90% accuracy, 77% sensitivity, and 94% specificity.
- The automated GG determination showed substantial agreement with a genitourinary pathologist (65% concordance, κ = 0.70).
Conclusions:
- A CNN-based approach enables accurate differentiation between non-atypical and malignant areas in prostate biopsies based on GPs.
- The automated system demonstrates substantial agreement with expert pathologist grading, offering a promising tool for improving prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment selection.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
05:49Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
Published on: October 10, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Fixed Action Patterns
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Classification of Neurotransmitters
Classification of Leukocytes
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...