Change in indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Dennis Lawin1, Christoph Stellbrink1
1Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offers benefits for heart failure (HF) patients with conduction delays. Patient selection is crucial, favoring wide QRS complexes and tailoring device choice to individual needs for optimal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with ventricular conduction delay.
- Indications for CRT have expanded beyond sinus rhythm and advanced HF to include patients with mild-to-moderate HF, atrial fibrillation, and those requiring antibradycardia pacing.
- Patient selection for CRT is critical, with wide QRS complexes (>150 ms) and left bundle branch block morphology showing the most benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of current indications for CRT.
- To discuss the evolving role of CRT in heart failure management.
- To guide the decision-making process for CRT device selection.
Main Methods:
- Review of published literature on CRT indications.
- Analysis of European guidelines for pacing and heart failure.
- Synthesis of evidence regarding patient selection and device choice.
Main Results:
- Patients with wide QRS complexes benefit most from CRT; narrow QRS complexes (<130 ms) may be associated with harm.
- No mortality benefit demonstrated for CRT defibrillators over CRT pacers alone in randomized trials.
- Older patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy may not benefit significantly from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Conclusions:
- CRT device selection (pacer vs. defibrillator) should be individualized based on therapeutic goals, patient age, cardiac disease, and comorbidities.
- Careful patient selection is paramount for optimizing CRT efficacy and avoiding potential harm.
- Further research is needed to clarify the role of defibrillators in specific patient populations.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has rapidly evolved as a standard therapy for heart failure (HF) patients with ventricular conduction delay. Although in early trials, only patients with sinus rhythm and advanced stages of HF have been candidates for CRT, more recent data have expanded the indications to patients with mild-to-moderate HF and atrial fibrillation and patients in need of antibradycardia pacing with reduced left ventricular function. On the other hand, it is now well recognized that patients with a wide QRS (>150 ms) and left bundle branch block morphology benefit most from CRT, whereas in patients with a more narrow QRS complex (<130 ms) CRT may actually be harmful despite the evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony by echocardiography. There is no prospective randomized study showing mortality benefit from a combined CRT defibrillating device over a CRT pacer alone. This is especially important because recent data indicate that older patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy may not benefit from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator as much as previously thought. Thus, the decision for a CRT pacer versus CRT defibrillating should be tailored to the therapeutic goal (improvement in prognosis versus symptomatic relief), patient age, underlying cardiac disease and comorbidities. This article gives an overview over the current indications for CRT according to published literature and the European guidelines for pacing and HF.
More Related Videos
11:51Construction of Defined Human Engineered Cardiac Tissues to Study Mechanisms of Cardiac Cell Therapy
Published on: March 1, 2016
08:28Methods for ECG Evaluation of Indicators of Cardiac Risk, and Susceptibility to Aconitine-induced Arrhythmias in Rats Following Status Epilepticus
Published on: April 5, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Global Climate Change
Work Done During Volume Change
Consider a gas confined to a cylinder fitted with a movable piston at one end. If the gas expands from volume V1 to volume V2, it exerts a force on the piston, such that the piston moves by a distance dr.
The work done by the gas on the piston can be expressed as
Net Change Theorem
Standard Entropy Change for a Reaction
Le Chatelier's Principle: Changing Temperature
To understand this phenomenon, consider the elementary reaction:
