Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Acrylic Resin Molding Based Head Fixation Technique in Rodents
Published on: January 12, 2016
Analysis of behavior of the wear coefficient in different layers of acrylic resin teeth
Priscila N Uehara1, Carolina M Iegami1, Regina Tamaki2
1Graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Statement Of Problem:
Analysis of the wear coefficient (k) of the superficial and deep layers of acrylic resin teeth can help predict denture durability, but little has been published on the wear coefficient of denture teeth.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the k value for the superficial and deep layers of the acrylic resin teeth of 6 different brands by using the fixed-ball microabrasive wear method.
Material And Methods:
Six artificial tooth specimens of 4 commercial brands were tested: Artiplus IPN (Ar), Biotone IPN (Bi), Magister (Ma), Premium (Pr), Trilux (Tr), and SR Vivodent (Vi). Two specimens from each brand were created, one for the superficial layer and the other for the deep layer. The test was performed on fixed-ball microabrasive wear equipment set to operate at a constant normal force of 0.5 N and a rotation speed of 100 rpm. The test time periods were 5.00, 8.33, and 11.66 minutes. The characteristics of the wear craters were measured by using an optical microscope at a magnification of ×50 and Leica Microsystems software. Wear coefficient (k) values were deduced by using the Archard equation for abrasive wear, Q=k·N, and were analyzed by using 1-way analysis of variance, complemented by the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). A different analysis was used for each layer.
Results:
The analysis of variance of the wear coefficient revealed significant differences among the groups regarding the superficial layers (P=.009). The Tukey HSD test showed that the k values for the superficial layers of Artiplus specimens were significantly lower than those of the Vivodent and Magister specimens.
Conclusions:
One brand (Ar) presented significantly lower wear coefficient value for the surface layer. No difference in wear coefficient values was found among the tooth brands for the deep layer.
Related Concept Videos
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Confidence Coefficient
Coefficient of Variation
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

