Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Mouse Body Temperature Measurement Using Infrared Thermometer During Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis and Food Allergy Evaluation
Published on: September 14, 2018
Providing cost-effective care for food allergy
Marcus Shaker1, Matthew Greenhawt2
1Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Section of Allergy and Immunology, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Many food allergy management strategies are not cost-effective. Optimizing care involves patient preferences, timely oral food challenges, and value-based pricing for treatments like immunotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Health Economics
- Public Health
Background:
- Food allergy management encompasses various strategies, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
- Evaluating the economic impact of these strategies is crucial for resource allocation and optimal patient care.
- Previous cost-effectiveness analyses in this field have yielded varied results, necessitating a comprehensive review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize the existing literature on the cost-effectiveness of different food allergy management strategies.
- To identify which management approaches are economically viable and which require optimization.
- To inform clinical guidelines and healthcare policy regarding food allergy care.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review and synthesis of relevant literature.
- Systematic search of PubMed for articles evaluating the cost-effectiveness of food allergy management.
- Inclusion of studies reporting on screening, diagnosis, allergen labeling, emergency care, and immunotherapy.
Main Results:
- Infant peanut allergy screening is not cost-effective due to overdiagnosis risks.
- Optimizing care involves timely oral food challenges, clarifying allergen labeling, patient-preference sensitive emergency service activation, and value-based pricing for epinephrine.
- Peanut immunotherapy (epicutaneous or probiotic-based) shows favorable cost-effectiveness, particularly with improved health utility and sustained unresponsiveness.
Conclusions:
- Several aspects of current food allergy management lack cost-effectiveness.
- Incorporating patient and family preferences into decision-making is essential for guideline-based care.
- Further research is needed to understand health state utilities in specific patient populations for improved cost-effectiveness analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Regulation of Food Intake
Standards of Care I
Continuing Care
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry

