Oropharyngeal Colostrum for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Harshad Panchal1,2,3, Gayatri Athalye-Jape1,2,3, Sanjay Patole1,3

  • 1Neonatal Directorate, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, Western Australia.

Insights

Oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) administration is safe for preterm infants but did not significantly improve key health outcomes like necrotizing enterocolitis or sepsis in this review. Further research is needed to confirm potential benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) administration is a potential intervention for preterm infants.
  • Previous studies suggest OPC may be safe, feasible, and beneficial for this vulnerable population.
  • The immunomodulatory and nutritional effects of OPC warrant further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and assess the effects of oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) administration in preterm infants.
  • To evaluate the impact of OPC on major neonatal outcomes including necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, and mortality.
  • To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs regarding OPC's efficacy and safety.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs).
  • Comprehensive literature search across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane) and gray literature up to April 2018.
  • Inclusion of 6 RCTs (n=269) and 4 non-RCTs (n=737); one RCT on bovine colostrum was excluded.

Main Results:

  • Meta-analysis of RCT data revealed no significant differences in the incidence of stage 2 necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, or all-cause mortality.
  • OPC administration did not significantly alter the duration of hospital stay or time to full enteral feeds in preterm infants.
  • OPC increased secretory IgA and lactoferrin concentrations and had a transient effect on the oral microbiome; no adverse events were reported.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence suggests oropharyngeal colostrum (OPC) is safe and feasible for preterm infants but does not demonstrate significant benefits for major clinical outcomes.
  • The overall quality of evidence is very low, highlighting limitations in existing studies.
  • Larger, adequately powered RCTs are essential to definitively establish the potential nutritional and immunomodulatory benefits of OPC in preterm neonates.

Related Concept Videos

Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway01:25

Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway

In preparing for oropharyngeal airway suctioning, a nurse must gather all necessary equipment, including a suction unit with tubing, a prepackaged suction kit, sterile gloves, water or saline for irrigation, a water-soluble lubricant, and additional personal protective equipment (such as a gown, mask, and goggles) to control infections.
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
862
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.7K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
5.8K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.7K