DCE-MRI protocol for constraining absolute pharmacokinetic modeling errors within specific accuracy limits
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Utilizing 3D Printing Technology to Merge MRI with Histology: A Protocol for Brain Sectioning
Published on: December 6, 2016
Silvin P Knight1,2, James F Meaney1,2, Andrew J Fagan3
1School of Medicine, Trinity College University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Purpose:
To quantify the effects of DCE acquisition and pharmacokinetic modeling processing methodologies on the absolute accuracy and precision of derived pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter values using a novel anthropomorphic phantom test device in which "ground truth" values were known a priori.
Methods:
Ground truth arterial input function (AIF), tumor, and healthy tissue contrast agent concentration-time curves (CTCs) were established within the phantom and repeatedly measured on a 3T MRI scanner with varying temporal resolution (Tres = 1.22-30.6 s). Ground truth CTCs, Ktrans , ve , and kep values were directly compared to measured values as a function of Tres , with and without the application of voxel-wise flip-angle corrections applied to the data and PK modeling performed using linear and nonlinear forms of the standard Tofts model.
Results:
Measurement of the AIF was strongly affected by the Tres used (AIF curve-shape feature errors: 3%-222% for Tres : 1.22-30.6 s), which directly translated to errors in the derived Ktrans , ve , and kep values of 1%-24%, 2%-5%, and 1%-26% respectively across this Tres range (flip-angle correction applied). Further appreciable improvements in accuracy and precision arising from the use of flip angle corrections and nonlinear least squares fitting were quantified and used to identify optimal acquisition and analysis methodologies for which measurement errors could be constrained below threshold levels.
Conclusion:
This quantitative study provides insight into how errors in AIF measurement propagate to errors in PK parameter outputs. Absolute quantification of the accuracy and precision of MR-measured CTCs, and resultant PK parameter values, allowed for an optimal temporal resolution to be defined commensurate with maintaining Ktrans , ve , and kep measurement errors below 5% and 10% levels. An appreciable gain in PK parameter estimation accuracy at the analysis stage was also demonstrated using flip-angle corrections and a linear approach to PK model fitting.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...

