A New Classification of Benign, Premalignant, and Malignant Endometrial Tissues Using Machine Learning Applied to
Michael J Downing1, David J Papke, Svitlana Tyekucheva
1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.J.D., D.J.P., G.L.M.) Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School (D.J.P., G.L.M.) Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute (S.T.) Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health (S.T.), Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract:
Benign normal (NL), premalignant (endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, EIN) and malignant (cancer, EMCA) endometria must be precisely distinguished for optimal management. EIN was objectively defined previously as a regression model incorporating manually traced histologic variables to predict clonal growth and cancer outcomes. Results from this early computational study were used to revise subjective endometrial precancer diagnostic criteria currently in use. We here use automated feature segmentation and updated machine learning algorithms to develop a new classification algorithm. Endometrial tissue from 148 patients was randomly separated into 72-patient training and 76-patient validation cohorts encompassing all 3 diagnostic classes. We applied image analysis software to keratin stained endometrial tissues to automatically segment whole-slide digital images into epithelium, cells, and nuclei and extract corresponding variables. A total of 1413 variables were culled to 75 based on random forest classification performance in a 3-group (NL, EIN, EMCA) model. This algorithm correctly classifies cases with 3-class error rates of 0.04 (training set) and 0.058 (validation set); and 2-class (NL vs. EIN+EMCA) error rate of 0.016 (training set) and 0 (validation set). The 4 most heavily weighted variables are surrogates of those previously identified in manual-segmentation machine learning studies (stromal and epithelial area percentages, and normalized epithelial surface lengths). Lesser weighted predictors include gland and lumen axis lengths and ratios, and individual cell measures. Automated image analysis and random forest classification algorithms can classify normal, premalignant, and malignant endometrial tissues. Highest predictive variables overlap with those discovered independently in early models based on manual segmentation.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Connective Tissues
Connective Tissue Proper
Connective tissue proper is the most abundant class of connective tissues. As its name implies, it predominantly connects different tissues in the body. Depending on the cell types, ground substance, viscosity, and fiber types in the ECM, connective tissue proper is further categorized into loose and dense....
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Overview
Based on the number of cell layers,...
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Simple Epithelium
Because of the thinness of the cells, simple squamous epithelium is present where the rapid passage of chemical compounds is observed. For example, the endothelium that lines the capillaries and vessels...
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Stratified Epithelium
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Glandular Epithelium
Multicellular glands are formed during early development when epithelial budding...
Machines
A free-body diagram of the...


