Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
Published on: October 25, 2011
Folate Receptor Immunohistochemical Staining Heterogeneity in Gynecologic Cancers
Barrett C Lawson1, Anais Malpica
1Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Re-evaluating folate receptor alpha (FRα) expression in ovarian cancer cases revealed significant discrepancies between original reports and pathologist review. This highlights challenges in FRα scoring, impacting treatment decisions for patients receiving targeted therapies like mirvetuximab soravtansine.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Pathology
- Oncology
- Immunohistochemistry
Background:
- Mirvetuximab soravtansine targets folate receptor alpha (FRα) and is used for ovarian cancer with high FRα expression.
- Accurate FRα assessment is crucial for patient eligibility for FRα-targeted therapies.
- Heterogeneous FRα expression can complicate immunohistochemical scoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reliability of FRα immunohistochemical scoring in a cohort of gynecologic pathology cases.
- To identify discrepancies between original clinical reports and expert re-review of FRα staining.
- To evaluate the clinical significance of scoring changes for FRα-targeted therapy eligibility.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 120 gynecologic pathology cases with prior FOLR1 immunohistochemistry.
- Collection of clinical and pathological data, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and FIGO stage.
- Standardized re-evaluation of FRα staining by two gynecologic pathologists, assessing intensity, percentage of positive cells, and staining patterns.
- Comparison of original reported scores with re-review scores to identify significant changes.
Main Results:
- Original reports classified 56.3% of 119 cases as FRα positive, while re-review found 42.5% of 120 cases positive.
- A clinically significant change in FRα status (positive to negative or vice versa) occurred in 15.1% of cases.
- Resection specimens showed a higher rate of significant scoring changes (19.8%) compared to biopsy specimens (5.3%).
- Seventeen cases initially reported as positive were reclassified as negative, impacting potential treatment eligibility.
Conclusions:
- Significant discordance exists between initial FRα scoring and expert re-evaluation, particularly in resection specimens.
- Heterogeneous FRα expression patterns contribute to scoring difficulties and potential misinterpretation.
- Standardized scoring criteria and pathologist expertise are essential to ensure accurate FRα assessment for guiding targeted therapy decisions in ovarian cancer.
More Related Videos
05:16Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining of Four Endometrial Immune Cell Types in Recurrent Miscarriage
Published on: August 4, 2021
07:54Surface-enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Nanoprobe Ratiometry for Detecting Microscopic Ovarian Cancer via Folate Receptor Targeting
Published on: March 25, 2019