Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Can real-time feedback improve the simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of basic life support
Jeyapal Kandasamy1, Peter S Theobald1, Ian K Maconochie2
1Biomedical Engineering Research Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Insights
Real-time feedback significantly improves infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance in both basic life support (BLS) trained and lay rescuers. Rescue breaths did not negatively impact chest compression quality, but duty cycle calculation needs standardization.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Resuscitation
- Cardiopulmonary Physiology
Background:
- High-quality chest compressions are vital for effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
- Key performance metrics include depth, rate, release force, and duty cycle.
- Infant CPR presents unique challenges for rescuers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of real-time feedback on infant CPR performance.
- To assess if rescue breaths affect chest compression quality in infant CPR.
- To report data on duty cycle calculation methods for infant CPR.
Main Methods:
- Basic life support (BLS) trained (n=28) and lay (n=38) rescuers performed infant CPR on a manikin.
- Rescuers were randomized into feedback and no-feedback groups.
- Chest compression quality was assessed across three algorithms, including variations with rescue breaths.
Main Results:
- Rescuers receiving feedback showed significant improvements in CPR quality compared to the no-feedback groups.
- Feedback groups achieved over 60% (BLS) and 25% (lay) compliance with all CPR targets.
- Rescue breaths did not impede chest compression quality.
Conclusions:
- Real-time feedback systems can substantially enhance infant CPR performance.
- Rescue breaths do not compromise chest compression quality during infant CPR.
- Standardization of duty cycle calculation methods is urgently needed.
Background:
Performing high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires achieving of a target depth, release force, rate and duty cycle.
Objective:
This study evaluates whether 'real time' feedback could improve infant CPR performance in basic life support-trained (BLS) and lay rescuers. It also investigates whether delivering rescue breaths hinders performing high-quality chest compressions. Also, this study reports raw data from the two methods used to calculate duty cycle performance.
Methodology:
BLS (n=28) and lay (n=38) rescuers were randomly allocated to respective 'feedback' or 'no-feedback' groups, to perform two-thumb chest compressions on an instrumented infant manikin. Chest compression performance was then investigated across three compression algorithms (compression only; five rescue breaths then compression only; five rescue breaths then 15:2 compressions). Two different routes to calculate duty cycle were also investigated, due to conflicting instruction in the literature.
Results:
No-feedback BLS and lay groups demonstrated <3% compliance against each performance target. The feedback rescuers produced 20-fold and 10-fold increases in BLS and lay cohorts, respectively, achieving all targets concurrently in >60% and >25% of all chest compressions, across all three algorithms. Performing rescue breaths did not impede chest compression quality.
Conclusions:
A feedback system has great potential to improve infant CPR performance, especially in cohorts that have an underlying understanding of the technique. The addition of rescue breaths-a potential distraction-did not negatively influence chest compression quality. Duty cycle performance depended on the calculation method, meaning there is an urgent requirement to agree a single measure.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

