Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Analyzing Hospital Transfers Using INTERACT Acute Care Transfer Tools: Lessons from MOQI
Lori L Popejoy1, Amy A Vogelsmeier1, Greg L Alexander1
1Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Objectives:
We explored the differences in potentially avoidable/unavoidable hospital transfers in a retrospective analysis of Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) Acute Transfer Tools (ACTs) completed by advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) working in the Missouri Quality Improvement (QI) Initiative (MOQI).
Design:
Cross-sectional descriptive study of 3996 ACTs for 32.5 calendar months from 2014 to 2016. Univariate analyses examined differences between potentially avoidable vs unavoidable transfers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of candidate factors identified those contributing to avoidable transfers.
Setting:
Sixteen nursing homes (NHs), ranging from 120 to 321 beds, in urban, metro, and rural communities within 80 miles of a large midwestern city.
Participants:
A total of 5168 residents with a median age of 82 years.
Measurements:
Data from 3946 MOQI-adapted ACTs.
Results:
A total of 54% of hospital transfers were identified as avoidable. QI opportunities related to avoidable transfers were earlier detection of new signs/symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.61-3.42; P < .001); discussions of resident/family preference (OR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.38-3.25; P < .001); advance directive/hospice care (OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.33-3.82; P = .003); better communication about condition (OR = 4.93; 95% CI = 3.17-7.68; P < .001); and condition could have been managed in the NH (OR = 16.63; 95% CI = 10.9-25.37; P < .001). Three factors related to unavoidable transfers were bleeding (OR = .59; 95% CI = .46-.77; P < .001), nausea/vomiting (OR = .7; 95% CI = .54-.91; P = .007), and resident/family preference for hospitalization (OR = .79; 95% CI = .68-.93; P = .003).
Conclusion:
Reducing avoidable hospital transfers in NHs requires challenging assumptions about what is avoidable so QI efforts can be directed to improving NH capacity to manage ill residents. The APRNs served as the onsite coaches in the use and adoption of INTERACT. Changes in health policy would provide a revenue stream to support APRN presence in NH, a role that is critical to improving resident outcomes by increasing staff capacity to identify illness and guide system change. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1953-1959, 2019.
More Related Videos
11:46Investigating Protein-protein Interactions in Live Cells Using Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Published on: May 26, 2014
11:33Investigating Interactions Between Histone Modifying Enzymes and Transcription Factors in vivo by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Published on: October 14, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
Transfer RNA Synthesis
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
Maximum Power Transfer
By substituting the entire circuit with...
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer I
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer II