Biomarkers for detecting malignant pleural mesothelioma: Protocol for a reanalysis of published data based on

Xiangyi Zan1,2,3, Yuping Wang2,3, Junnian Shi1

  • 1Department of Respiratory, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University Second Clinical Medical College.

Medicine
|June 14, 2019
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study evaluates systematic reviews on biomarkers for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) diagnosis. It aims to identify the best diagnostic biomarker by assessing review quality and reanalyzing data.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Biomarker Research
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
  • Early diagnosis is crucial for patient survival, yet effective treatments remain limited.
  • Existing systematic reviews (SRs) assess diagnostic biomarkers for MPM, but their quality and comparative performance are unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess the methodological quality of existing SRs on MPM diagnostic biomarkers.
  • To re-evaluate published data from these SRs to identify the optimal biomarker for early MPM detection.
  • To provide evidence-based guidance on selecting the most effective diagnostic biomarker for MPM.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search across major databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science) for relevant SRs.
  • Methodological quality assessment of included SRs using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) tool.
  • Comparative analysis of biomarker diagnostic accuracy using standard pairwise and adjusted indirect meta-analysis.

Main Results:

  • Results are pending publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
  • The study will present a comparative analysis of diagnostic performance for various MPM biomarkers.
  • Identification of the biomarker with superior diagnostic accuracy based on the re-analysis of SR data.

Conclusions:

  • This study will identify the most effective biomarker for the early diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
  • Findings will guide clinical practice and future research in MPM diagnostics.
  • The re-analysis of SRs will offer a robust assessment of biomarker utility in MPM.

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
100.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K
Pleural Effusion I: Introduction01:25

Pleural Effusion I: Introduction

Pleural effusion is an abnormal fluid accumulation in the pleural cavity, a narrow space between the lungs and the chest wall. It is not a disease per se but rather a symptom or indication of an underlying disease. In normal circumstances, this space contains a small amount of fluid (5 to 15 mL), a lubricant facilitating the non-frictional movement of the pleural surfaces.
There are two main types of pleural effusion: transudative and exudative. They are differentiated using Light's...
4.1K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
14.6K