Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Based Diagnostic Platform to Detect Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue 1
Published on: March 13, 2018
Detection of NTRK Fusions: Merits and Limitations of Current Diagnostic Platforms
James P Solomon1, Jaclyn F Hechtman2
1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract:
Oncogenic fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 with various partners are diagnostic of infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinoma yet also occur in lower frequencies across many types of malignancies. Recently, targeted small molecular inhibitor therapy has been shown to induce a durable response in a high percentage of patients with NTRK fusion-positive cancers, which has made the detection of NTRK fusions critical. Several techniques for NTRK fusion diagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNA-based NGS. Each of these assays has unique features, advantages, and limitations, and familiarity with these assays is critical to appropriately screen for NTRK fusions. Here, we review the details of each existing methodology.
Insights
Detecting NTRK gene fusions is crucial for targeted cancer therapy. This review details various diagnostic methods like IHC, FISH, and NGS, highlighting their unique strengths and weaknesses for NTRK fusion screening.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Oncology
- Genetics
- Cancer Diagnostics
Background:
- Oncogenic NTRK gene fusions (NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3) are key drivers in specific cancers like infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinoma.
- These fusions are increasingly found in various malignancies, necessitating accurate detection for effective treatment.
- Targeted therapies show high response rates in NTRK fusion-positive cancers, underscoring the importance of diagnostic assays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare existing methodologies for detecting NTRK gene fusions.
- To provide insights into the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic technique.
- To emphasize the critical role of familiarity with these assays for appropriate screening.
Main Methods:
- Review of established diagnostic techniques including pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC).
- Analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
- Evaluation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches, both DNA-based and RNA-based.
Main Results:
- Each reviewed method (IHC, FISH, RT-PCR, DNA-NGS, RNA-NGS) possesses distinct characteristics.
- Understanding the specific features, benefits, and drawbacks of each assay is essential for clinical application.
- No single method is universally superior; assay selection depends on clinical context and diagnostic goals.
Conclusions:
- Accurate identification of NTRK fusions is paramount for guiding targeted therapy in cancer patients.
- A comprehensive understanding of available diagnostic tools is necessary for effective NTRK fusion screening.
- Continued evaluation and appropriate application of these methodologies will improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
19:23Use of Recombinant Fusion Proteins in a Fluorescent Protease Assay Platform and Their In-gel Renaturation
Published on: January 16, 2019
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Limiting Reactant
The Number e as a Limit
Electrical Current
Central Limit Theorem
The sample size, n, that...