Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026
A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Identification of gastrointestinal perforation based on ICD-10 code in a Japanese administrative medical information
Masatoshi Tanigawa1, Yoko Kataoka1, Takayoshi Kishino2
1Department of Medical Informatics, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation ICD-10 coding in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database and to examine drug exposure risk factors for GI perforation.
Methods:
A total of 100 patients with GI perforation ICD-10 codes were selected randomly from Kagawa University Hospital's DPC database between April 2011 and December 2016. Two experienced specialist physicians independently reviewed the medical records and classified cases as "definite A," "definite B," "probable," or "no GI perforation." The positive predictive values (PPVs) of "definite A/B" cases were calculated after stratification by sex, age, ICD-10 code, and diagnostic information in the DPC data. The number of prescribed drugs with side effects of GI perforation according to historical data was compared between "definite A/B" and "no GI perforation" cases.
Results:
The overall PPV was 47.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.9-57.2). However, the PPVs for the three categories of diagnostic information in the DPC data ("main diagnosis," "diagnosis causing admission," and "most resource-intensive diagnosis") were each more than 70% after excluding inappropriate patients. Additionally, the PPV focused on these three categories was 76.3% (95% CI, 59.8-88.6). Prescribed drugs with side effects of GI perforation were more frequently detected in "definite A/B" cases (P = .028).
Conclusions:
Although the overall PPV for GI perforation based on ICD-10 code was low, our results suggest that the PPV could be improved by appropriate selection of DPC diagnosis category and that use of multiple medications enhances the risk of GI perforation.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
01:18Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In...
01:18Additional Routes of Drug Administration
Administering drugs via inhalation allows for the direct delivery of gaseous, volatile substances or droplets to different parts of the respiratory tract. One of the advantages of the inhalation route is the rapid absorption of drugs into the circulatory system, which is possible because of the large surface area of...
01:18Routes of Drug Administration: Enteral
Enteral administration involves drug administration via the mouth in two ways: orally or sublingually.
Unlike sublingually drugs, drugs that are taken orally pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and get metabolized by the liver. Once metabolized, the drug is absorbed into the systemic circulation, reaching different body parts via the bloodstream. However, while passing through the stomach,...
01:19Factors Affecting Drug Distribution: Miscellaneous Factors
Age plays a significant role due to differences in body composition among different age groups. Infants, for instance, have a higher proportion of total body water and lower albumin levels, a protein that binds drugs in the bloodstream. This unique composition in infants enhances the...
01:25Routes of Drug Administration: Parenteral
The intravenous route (IV) of drug administration can be further categorized into two types. The bolus injection administers the entire dose rapidly, while an intravenous infusion slowly delivers smaller doses steadily.
The IV route is often...