Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

29.8K
Structural proteins are a category of proteins responsible for functions ranging from cell shape and movement to providing support to major structures such as bones, cartilage, hair, and muscles. This group includes proteins such as collagen, actin, myosin, and keratin.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in mammals, is found throughout the body. In connective tissue, such as skin, ligaments, and tendons, it provides tensile strength and elasticity.  In bones and teeth, it mineralizes to...
29.8K
Structural Protein Function01:56

Structural Protein Function

3.2K
3.2K
Protein and Protein Structure02:15

Protein and Protein Structure

87.1K
Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...
87.1K
Mutations01:39

Mutations

94.4K
Overview
94.4K
Mutations01:35

Mutations

44.1K
Mutations are changes in the sequence of DNA. These changes can occur spontaneously or they can be induced by exposure to environmental factors. Mutations can be characterized in a number of different ways: whether and how they alter the amino acid sequence of the protein, whether they occur over a small or large area of DNA, and whether they occur in somatic cells or germline cells.
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
44.1K
Protein and Protein Structures02:15

Protein and Protein Structures

18.8K
18.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineering and Application of a Thermostable MHETase for PET Depolymerization.

ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering·2026
Same author

Hypervariable loop profiling decodes sequence determinants of antibody stability.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

Determinants of metal import and specificity in a bacterial transporter.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The 2025 Westlake Autumn Symposium for Al Proteomics and Virtual Cell.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Machine learning enables efficient and effective affinity maturation of nanobodies.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Pertpy: an end-to-end framework for perturbation analysis.

Nature methods·2025
Same journal

Mutations in splicing factor gene U2AF1 rescue defective oncogene splicing in KRAS-mutant cancers.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the effect of immune surveillance on clonal expansions in the blood.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Improved heritability partitioning and enrichment analyses using summary statistics with graphREML.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

U2AF1 mutations rescue deleterious exon skipping induced by KRAS mutations.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing from cellular heritage to disease destiny.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Multiomics analysis of primary metabolism reveals the genetic basis of nitrogen partitioning modulated by ZmAVT1A-1 in maize.

Nature genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.2K

Inferring protein 3D structure from deep mutation scans.

Nathan J Rollins1, Kelly P Brock1,2, Frank J Poelwijk3

  • 1Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Nature Genetics
|June 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a new method to determine protein and RNA 3D structures using laboratory-induced mutations. Analyzing large-scale mutational scans revealed that specific residue interactions (epistasis) are sufficient for predicting molecular folds.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K
Structure Solution of the Fluorescent Protein Cerulean Using MeshAndCollect
06:42

Structure Solution of the Fluorescent Protein Cerulean Using MeshAndCollect

Published on: March 19, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.2K
Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
07:47

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K
Structure Solution of the Fluorescent Protein Cerulean Using MeshAndCollect
06:42

Structure Solution of the Fluorescent Protein Cerulean Using MeshAndCollect

Published on: March 19, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Natural evolutionary sequence covariation has been successfully used to predict protein and RNA structures.
  • The potential of synthetically generated sequence variations, such as those from laboratory mutational scans, for structure determination remained unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether laboratory-induced, synthetic sequence variations can be utilized for three-dimensional (3D) structure determination of macromolecules.
  • To establish a novel experimental method for 3D structure prediction leveraging high-throughput mutational data.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of five large-scale experimental mutational scans.
  • Identification of residue pairs exhibiting the largest positive epistasis within these scans.
  • Computation of ab initio protein folds using identified epistatic pairs as contact restraints.

Main Results:

  • The strongest epistatic pairings from genetic screens of proteins and a ribozyme accurately reveal 3D contacts within and between macromolecules.
  • Ab initio structure prediction for a GB1 domain (1.8 Å accuracy) and a WW domain (2.1 Å accuracy) was achieved using experimental epistatic pairs.
  • Strategies were proposed to reduce the number of mutants required for accurate contact prediction.

Conclusions:

  • Laboratory-generated sequence variation, specifically positive epistasis, is a viable and powerful tool for determining macromolecular 3D structures.
  • This genomics-inspired approach offers an efficient alternative to traditional methods for predicting protein and RNA folds.
  • The findings suggest a paradigm shift towards utilizing synthetic genetic data for structural biology.