Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

7.0K

Registry stakeholders.

Anne Lübbeke1,2, Andrew J Carr2, Pierre Hoffmeyer1

  • 1Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland.

EFORT Open Reviews
|June 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of blood cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, predictors of elevated levels, and associations with clinical symptoms.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Thermo-mobility coupling: continuous knee temperature-step interaction patterns predict functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

Editorial: The value of arthroplasty registries: from surveillance to societal impact.

Acta orthopaedica·2026
Same author

What aspects of pain and functional outcomes contribute to patient satisfaction 1 year after surgery within total hip and total knee arthroplasty populations? A registry-based cohort study.

Acta orthopaedica·2026
Same author

Changing the practice setting and organizational environment does not impact an orthopedic surgeon's surgical performance in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2026
Same author

A steady hand in a world of turmoil.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

Optimizing diagnosis and management of ONFH, FNSF, and SIF.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

MRI-guided detection of knee injuries as a concomitant lesion of femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

Orthopedic preoperative evaluation and surgical strategies of hereditary multiple osteochondromas involving the spinal region.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

Distal biceps tendon repair: immobilization versus early mobilization. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

THA for DDH: replacement principles and techniques - acetabular side.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same journal

Salvage surgery of the hip in non-ambulatory cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

EFORT open reviews·2026
See all related articles

Clinical registries collect real-world health data for better healthcare. Effective collaboration among patients, providers, and regulators is key to maximizing registry utility and generating actionable knowledge.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Public Health
  • Real-World Data

Background:

  • Clinical registries are vital health information systems designed for long-term, multidimensional real-world data collection.
  • They aim to generate actionable knowledge to address significant healthcare challenges.
  • Understanding stakeholders and their roles is crucial for registry success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of clinical registries, their structure, and functioning.
  • To examine the interests and involvement of various stakeholders in registry operations.
  • To discuss challenges and strategies for optimizing registry effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical registry structures and stakeholder interactions.
  • Analysis of specific stakeholder interests (patients, providers, financiers, agencies, industry, researchers, media).
Keywords:
health information systemregistrystakeholder

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.5K
Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Alzheimer's Patients
06:08

Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Alzheimer's Patients

Published on: April 4, 2025

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

7.0K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.5K
Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Alzheimer's Patients
06:08

Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Alzheimer's Patients

Published on: April 4, 2025

2.1K
  • Discussion of challenges in stakeholder engagement, cost reporting integration, and utility proof.
  • Main Results:

    • Identified key stakeholders including patients, healthcare providers, financiers, public health agencies, industry, researchers, and media.
    • Highlighted challenges in stakeholder interaction and the need to strengthen the patient's role.
    • Emphasized the importance of cost reporting for value-based decisions and demonstrating clinical/public health utility.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimal clinical registries are characterized by mission-driven, independent collaboration among stakeholders.
    • Effective registries facilitate rapid, transparent, and open-access knowledge generation and dissemination.
    • Strengthening stakeholder engagement and demonstrating utility are essential for maximizing the impact of clinical registries.