Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
Published on: November 10, 2023
Phenomapping of subgroups in hypertensive patients using unsupervised data-driven cluster analysis: An exploratory
Da-Ya Yang1,2, Zhi-Qiang Nie3, Li-Zhen Liao4
1Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, China.
Insights
Hypertension patient subgroups identified through data analysis show varied cardiovascular risks and treatment responses. Intensive treatment benefits some groups, while others face increased adverse effects, guiding personalized care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Data Science in Medicine
Background:
- Hypertensive patients exhibit significant heterogeneity in cardiovascular prognosis and treatment response.
- A refined classification system is needed to identify high-risk individuals and guide personalized antihypertensive therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct patient subgroups within the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) cohort using unsupervised, data-driven cluster analysis.
- To investigate differences in cardiovascular outcomes and responses to intensive antihypertensive treatment among these subgroups.
Main Methods:
- Unsupervised cluster analysis of baseline variables from SPRINT participants.
- Cox regression analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiovascular outcomes.
- Comparison of intensive antihypertensive treatment effects across identified clusters.
Main Results:
- Four distinct patient clusters were identified: index hypertensives, chronic kidney disease hypertensives, obese hypertensives, and extra-risk hypertensives.
- Cluster 4 (extra risky hypertensives) exhibited the highest risk for primary outcomes.
- Intensive treatment benefited clusters 4 and 1, but increased adverse effects in cluster 2 (chronic kidney disease hypertensives).
Conclusions:
- Data-driven phenomapping stratifies SPRINT participants into four subgroups with differential cardiovascular prognoses and treatment responses.
- These findings suggest a hypothesis for personalized antihypertensive treatment strategies that requires prospective validation.
Background:
Hypertensive patients are highly heterogeneous in cardiovascular prognosis and treatment responses. A better classification system with phenomapping of clinical features would be of greater value to identify patients at higher risk of developing cardiovascular outcomes and direct individual decision-making for antihypertensive treatment.
Methods:
An unsupervised, data-driven cluster analysis was performed for all baseline variables related to cardiovascular outcomes and treatment responses in subjects from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), in order to identify distinct subgroups with maximal within-group similarities and between-group differences. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiovascular outcomes and compare the effect of intensive antihypertensive treatment in different clusters.
Results:
Four replicable clusters of patients were identified: cluster 1 (index hypertensives); cluster 2 (chronic kidney disease hypertensives); cluster 3 (obese hypertensives) and cluster 4 (extra risky hypertensives). In terms of prognosis, individuals in cluster 4 had the highest risk of developing primary outcomes. In terms of treatment responses, intensive antihypertensive treatment was shown to be beneficial only in cluster 4 (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98) and cluster 1 (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79) and was associated with an increased risk of severe adverse effects in cluster 2 (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.32).
Conclusion:
Using a data-driven approach, SPRINT subjects can be stratified into four phenotypically distinct subgroups with different profiles on cardiovascular prognoses and responses to intensive antihypertensive treatment. Of note, these results should be taken as hypothesis generating that warrant further validation in future prospective studies.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm

