Sparse Sampling of Silence Type I Errors With an Emphasis on Primary Auditory Cortex

Francis A M Manno1,2,3, Juan Fernandez-Ruiz4, Sinai H C Manno2,3

  • 1Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.

Insights

Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) analysis reveals high false positive rates. Researchers recommend using a conservative alpha level (P < 0.001) for ssfMRI studies to ensure result validity.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Background:

  • Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) enhances the primary auditory cortex blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal by interspersing silent periods, mitigating scanner noise artifacts.
  • Concerns exist regarding elevated type I error rates in resting-state fMRI due to hemodynamic response function (HRF) modeling techniques, potentially leading to unacceptable false positive findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate type I error rates in sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) across whole-brain and primary auditory cortex voxel-wise activation patterns.
  • To evaluate the impact of common ssfMRI analysis techniques on false positive rates.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (n=15) underwent ssfMRI scans.
  • An optimized paradigm determined the auditory stimuli HRF, which was then used with silent stimuli to assess false positives.
  • Voxel-wise analysis was performed on both whole-brain and primary auditory cortex data.

Main Results:

  • Common ssfMRI analysis techniques yield high type I error rates.
  • Similar error distributions were observed for whole-brain and primary auditory cortex analyses.
  • Type I error rates at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 were substantial, particularly for the auditory cortex (e.g., 9.02 ± 1.79% at P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Standard ssfMRI analysis methods are associated with high false positive rates.
  • A conservative alpha level (e.g., P < 0.001) is recommended for ssfMRI analyses to enhance result reliability.
  • Findings highlight the need for careful statistical thresholding in ssfMRI research.

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
10.8K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K