Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain
Published on: October 11, 2017
Sparse Sampling of Silence Type I Errors With an Emphasis on Primary Auditory Cortex
Francis A M Manno1,2,3, Juan Fernandez-Ruiz4, Sinai H C Manno2,3
1Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.
Abstract:
Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) enables stronger primary auditory cortex blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal by acquiring volumes interspersed with silence, reducing the physiological artifacts associated with scanner noise. Recent calculations of type I error rates associated with resting-state fMRI suggest that the techniques used to model the hemodynamic response function (HRF) might be resulting in higher false positives than is generally acceptable. In the present study, we analyze ssfMRI to determine type I error rates associated with whole brain and primary auditory cortex voxel-wise activation patterns. Study participants (n = 15, age 27.62 ± 3.21 years, range: 22-33 years; 6 females) underwent ssfMRI. An optimized paradigm was used to determine the HRF to auditory stimuli, which was then substituted for silent stimuli to ascertain false positives. We report that common techniques used for analyzing ssfMRI result in high type I error rates. The whole brain and primary auditory cortex voxel-wise analysis resulted in similar error distributions. The number of type I errors for P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 for the whole brain was 7.88 ± 9.29, 2.37 ± 3.54, and 0.53 ± 0.96% and for the auditory cortex was 9.02 ± 1.79, 2.95 ± 0.91, and 0.58 ± 0.21%, respectively. When conducting a ssfMRI analysis, conservative α level should be employed (α < 0.001) to bolster the results in the face of false positive results.
Insights
Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) analysis reveals high false positive rates. Researchers recommend using a conservative alpha level (P < 0.001) for ssfMRI studies to ensure result validity.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Background:
- Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) enhances the primary auditory cortex blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal by interspersing silent periods, mitigating scanner noise artifacts.
- Concerns exist regarding elevated type I error rates in resting-state fMRI due to hemodynamic response function (HRF) modeling techniques, potentially leading to unacceptable false positive findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate type I error rates in sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) across whole-brain and primary auditory cortex voxel-wise activation patterns.
- To evaluate the impact of common ssfMRI analysis techniques on false positive rates.
Main Methods:
- Participants (n=15) underwent ssfMRI scans.
- An optimized paradigm determined the auditory stimuli HRF, which was then used with silent stimuli to assess false positives.
- Voxel-wise analysis was performed on both whole-brain and primary auditory cortex data.
Main Results:
- Common ssfMRI analysis techniques yield high type I error rates.
- Similar error distributions were observed for whole-brain and primary auditory cortex analyses.
- Type I error rates at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 were substantial, particularly for the auditory cortex (e.g., 9.02 ± 1.79% at P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Standard ssfMRI analysis methods are associated with high false positive rates.
- A conservative alpha level (e.g., P < 0.001) is recommended for ssfMRI analyses to enhance result reliability.
- Findings highlight the need for careful statistical thresholding in ssfMRI research.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Random Error
Margin of Error

