Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Genome Engineering of Primary Human B Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9
Published on: November 3, 2020
The Human Right to Science and the Regulation of Human Germline Engineering
Andrea Boggio1, Bartha M Knoppers2, Jessica Almqvist3
11 Department of History and Social Sciences, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island.
Abstract:
There is currently no international consensus on how human germline engineering should be regulated. Existing national legislation fails to provide the governance framework necessary to regulate germline engineering in the CRISPR era. This is an obstacle to scientific and clinical advancements and inconsistent with human rights requirements. To move forward, we suggest that the human right to science is an ideal starting point for building consensus, at the national and international levels, on governing principles that promote responsible scientific and technological advancements. Regulatory frameworks must recognize the international nature of modern germline genome engineering research, the need for shared governance rather than tech-locked prohibitions, and the fact that humans are not their germline.
Related Concept Videos
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Biodiversity and Human Values
Master Transcription Regulators
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Epigenetic Regulation

