Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

10:43
Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding
Published on: June 27, 2014
20.5K
How to prevent medication errors: a multidimensional scaling study to investigate the distinguishability between
Andreas Schneider1, Harald Kolrep2, Christoph Jordi1
1a Ypsomed AG , Burgdorf , Switzerland.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
|June 28, 2019
Summary
Users can distinguish between similar self-injection devices based on attributes like color and shape. Understanding these device features helps prevent medication errors in subcutaneous drug delivery.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical technology
- Human-computer interaction
- Medical device design
Background:
- Subcutaneous drug delivery via self-injection devices is increasingly common.
- Similar device designs raise concerns about distinguishability and medication errors.
- Understanding user perception of device differences is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if users can effectively differentiate between self-injection device variants.
- To identify specific device attributes that influence user distinguishability.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-four participants (patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals) rated similarities of eight autoinjector variants.
- Multidimensional scaling analyzed ratings to identify key distinguishing attributes.
Main Results:
- Five attributes were found to drive device distinguishability.
- These include label color, device size, device shape, aspect ratio, and chromaticity.
- Specific user groups showed distinct patterns in distinguishing devices.
Conclusions:
- Empirical evidence confirms users can distinguish between self-injection device variants.
- Device attributes like color, size, shape, aspect ratio, and chromaticity are key.
- User characteristics and context influence how devices are distinguished, aiding error prevention.
Keywords:
Subcutaneous injectiondrug delivery systemsmedical device designmedication errorspatient safetyself-medicationMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Histone Variants at the Centromere
5.0K
Histone variants are the histone proteins with structural and sequence variations. These variants may be regarded as “mutant” forms that replace their canonical histone counterparts in the nucleosomes. Specific post-translational modifications on the histone variants enable further chromatin complexity and regulate tissue-specific gene expression. The most common histone variants are from histone H2A, H2B, and linker histone H1 families. However, several variants of histone H3...
5.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error
9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error
7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
279
Accurate diagnosis and effective prevention are critical in managing Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), which is linked to high mortality rates ranging from 10% to 80%. Timely recognition of at-risk patients and careful monitoring can significantly reduce the likelihood of kidney damage.Diagnostic Assessments:The diagnostic process starts with a comprehensive medical history to identify prerenal, intrarenal, and postrenal causes.Prerenal causes, such as dehydration, hypotension, or blood loss, should...
279

