Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: validation study in a Portuguese sample.
Joana Faria Anjos1,2, Maria João Heitor Dos Santos3,4, Maria Teresa Ribeiro1
1CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
BMJ Open
|June 30, 2019
Summary
This study validated the Portuguese Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), finding a three-factor structure for resilience measurement. This provides a reliable tool for research and intervention in Portuguese-speaking communities.
Area of Science:
- Psychological Measurement
- Health Psychology
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
Background:
- Resilience is a key factor in coping with adversity.
- The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a widely used measure of resilience.
- A validated Portuguese version of the CD-RISC is needed for research and clinical applications in Portuguese-speaking populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the structural validity and convergent validity of the first Portuguese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).
Main Methods:
- Two independent datasets from Portugal (N=476 and N=405) were used.
- Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were employed.
- The Portuguese CD-RISC was administered alongside measures of stress, life satisfaction, and health.
Main Results:
- EFA revealed a three-factor structure (self-efficacy, spirituality, social support) consistent across both samples.
- CFA supported the three-factor model, demonstrating a better fit than the original five-factor model.
- Convergent validity was supported by consistent correlations with validated measures of stress, life satisfaction, and health.
Conclusions:
- The Portuguese version of the CD-RISC demonstrates good structural and convergent validity.
- This validated scale is now available for research and intervention in Portuguese-speaking countries.
- Future research should explore the three-factor structure and further test convergent validity with diverse samples.
Keywords:
confirmatory factor analysisconvergent validityexploratory factor analysismental healthresilienceMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
13.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.8K
pH Scale
79.0K
Hydronium and hydroxide ions are present both in pure water and in all aqueous solutions, and their concentrations are inversely proportional as determined by the ion product of water (Kw). The concentrations of these ions in a solution are often critical determinants of the solution’s properties and the chemical behaviors of its other solutes. Two different solutions can differ in their hydronium or hydroxide ion concentrations by a million, billion, or even trillion times. A common means of...
79.0K
Data Validation
6.4K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.4K
Data Validation
628
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
628
Scaling
570
In designing and analyzing filters, resonant circuits, or circuit analysis at large, working with standard element values like 1 ohm, 1 henry, or 1 farad can be convenient before scaling these values to more realistic figures. This approach is widely utilized by not employing realistic element values in numerous examples and problems; it simplifies mastering circuit analysis through convenient component values. The complexity of calculations is thereby reduced, with the understanding that...
570
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
3.6K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.6K


