Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Influence of the Structural Accuracy of Homology Models on Their Applicability to Docking-Based Virtual Screening:
Abstract:
How accurate do structures of the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) need to be to effectively serve as platforms for docking-based virtual screening campaigns? To answer this research question, here, we targeted through controlled virtual screening experiments 23 homology models of the β2AR endowed with different levels of structural accuracy. Subsequently, we studied the correlation between virtual screening performance and structural accuracy of the targeted models. Moreover, we studied the correlation between virtual screening performance and template/target receptor sequence identity. Our study demonstrates that docking-based virtual screening campaigns targeting homology models of the β2AR, in the majority of the cases, yielded results that exceeded random expectations in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC). Moreover, with the most effective scoring method, over one-third and one-quarter of the models yielded results that exceeded random expectation also in terms of enrichment factors (EF1, EF5, and EF10) and BEDROC (α = 160.9), respectively. Not surprisingly, we found a detectable linear correlation between virtual screening performance and structural accuracy of the ligand-binding cavity. We also found a detectable linear correlation between virtual screening performance and structural accuracy of the second extracellular loop (EL2). Finally, our data indicate that, although there is no detectable linear correlation between virtual screening performance and template/β2AR sequence identity, models built on the basis of templates that show high sequence identity with the β2AR, especially within the ligand-biding cavity, performed consistently well. Conversely, models with lower sequence identity displayed performance levels that ranged from very good to random, with no apparent correlation with the sequence identity itself.
More Related Videos
10:25Screening Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds for Inhibiting UCHL3 Activity Based on Molecular Docking and Deubiquitinating Enzyme Probe Technology
Published on: November 22, 2024
16:41A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Receptors (Adrenoceptors): Classification
α-Adrenoceptors
α-Adrenoceptors are classified into two main subtypes: α1 and α2. The α1 adrenoceptors,...
Adrenergic Receptors: ɑ Subtype
Adrenaline ≥ Noradrenaline >> Isoprenaline
α-adrenoceptors are further divided into α1 and α2-adrenoceptors.
α1-Adrenoceptors: These receptors are located postsynaptically on the effector organs and cause constriction of smooth muscle mediated by activation of phospholipase...
Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors...
Homologous Recombination
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...