Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
MCDA-based deliberation to value health states: lessons learned from a pilot study
Fabia Gansen1, Julian Klinger2, Wolf Rogowski2
1Department of Health Care Management, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. gansen@ipp.uni-bremen.de.
This pilot study explored deriving a German value set for the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) using deliberation and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Consensus on a value set was not reached due to challenges in weighting and group dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Decision Science
- Quality of Life Research
Background:
- Growing interest in integrating value judgments into cost-utility analyses.
- Exploration of deliberation and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for transparent value integration.
- Need for a German value set for the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) based on societal values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To pilot a consensus process for deriving a German value set for the SF-6D.
- To integrate societal perspectives on health-related quality of life using a deliberative MCDA approach.
- To assess the feasibility of deriving SF-6D scores and weights from a self-determined and independent life perspective.
Main Methods:
- A one-day consensus conference employing a deliberative process and the MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique) MCDA method.
- Participants qualitatively rated pairwise comparisons of SF-6D health states.
- Scoring and weighting of SF-6D dimensions conducted in parallel group sessions and a subsequent plenary assembly.
Main Results:
- 34 participants recruited; consensus reached on SF-6D scores for most dimensions, but not pain.
- No consensus achieved on dimension weights due to disagreements on the acceptability of trade-offs.
- Participants identified large plenary group size and the weighting procedure as obstacles to consensus.
Conclusions:
- The pilot demonstrated a consensus-based approach for valuing health-related quality of life.
- Further research is required to refine deliberative processes for quantifiable outcomes.
- Recommendations include exploring smaller group sizes, longer conference durations, and alternative MCDA functions.
Related Concept Videos
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Health Literacy
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Purpose of Health Records II
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

