Lymphovascular Invasion as the Major Prognostic Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Cancer After Primary Esophagectomy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
Published on: September 11, 2021
Chung-Ping Hsu1,2, Cheng-Yen Chuang3, Po-Kuei Hsu4,5
1School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. cliffhsu@gmail.com.
Background:
Studies addressing both lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with or without neoadjuvant therapy are limited. We aimed to analyze the incidence and prognostic significance of LVI and PNI in patients with thoracic ESCC.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 520 patients with ESCC: 174 patients after neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery and 346 after primary esophagectomy, from two medical centers. The relationships between LVI, PNI, and other histological factors were evaluated. The Cox regression model was used for survival analysis.
Results:
Positive LVI and PNI were noted in 35.6% and 22.4% of patients with residual primary tumor after neoadjuvant treatment and in 39.6% and 24.0% of patients who underwent primary esophagectomy, respectively. In patients with neoadjuvant treatments, the 5-year overall survival rates were 12.7% and 28.3% in patients with positive LVI and negative LVI, respectively (p = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates were 6.4% and 29.9% in patients with positive PNI and negative PNI, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment, the 5-year overall survival rates were 28.2% and 61.1% in patients with positive LVI and negative LVI, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates were 30.2% and 52.5% in patients with positive PNI and negative PNI (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the presence of PNI was an independent prognostic factor in patients with neoadjuvant treatments, whereas the presence of LVI had more significant prognostic impact in patients with node-negative ESCC after primary esophagectomy.
Conclusions:
Both LVI and PNI statuses are significant prognostic factors for patients with ESCC. However, the prognostic impact of LVI was majorly in the subgroup of node-negative patients who received primary esophagectomy.
More Related Videos
06:36A Modified In vitro Invasion Assay to Determine the Potential Role of Hormones, Cytokines and/or Growth Factors in Mediating Cancer Cell Invasion
Published on: April 24, 2015
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Negative Regulator Molecules
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Major Organs of the Digestive System
Gastrointestinal tract:
Major Losses in Pipes
Fluid flow can be classified as laminar or turbulent, primarily based on the Reynolds number. This dimensionless number reflects the relative influence of inertial to viscous...
Major Hormones and Their Functions
Oxytocin, produced in the hypothalamus and released by the pituitary gland, plays a role in social bonding, childbirth, and...
Factors Affecting Solubility