Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Multicenter Laboratory Comparison of Iohexol Measurement
George J Schwartz1, Hongyue Wang2, Brian Erway3
1Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Laboratory comparisons revealed iohexol calibration differences impacting glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements. Adjusting for proficiency testing materials improved agreement between laboratories to within 1-2%.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Nephrology
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Iohexol is a contrast agent used for measuring kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
- Lack of standardized proficiency materials previously hindered accurate laboratory calibration for iohexol assays.
- A calibration shift at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) prompted a multi-center laboratory comparison.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare iohexol measurements across multiple laboratories.
- To assess the impact of calibration differences on GFR results.
- To evaluate the utility of proficiency testing materials for inter-laboratory agreement.
Main Methods:
- Duplicate analysis of fortified sera and patient samples were performed at URMC, University of Minnesota (UMN), Mayo Clinic, and University of Lund.
- Proficiency testing materials from Equalis AB were utilized.
- Iohexol calibration involved dilutions of Omnipaque™ 300, with concentrations measured by HPLC or LC-MS/MS.
Main Results:
- Initial comparisons showed URMC and Mayo calibrations were lower than UMN and Lund.
- After correction, URMC calibration became higher for fortified samples.
- Adjusting measurements using Equalis proficiency materials resulted in agreement within 1-2% across all laboratories.
Conclusions:
- URMC calibrator lots from 2006-2016 underestimated iohexol concentration by a factor of 0.89, potentially reducing calculated GFRs by 10-11%.
- GFR results for the CKiD study were adjusted to account for this calibration shift.
- Regular proficiency testing, sample exchange, and standardized calibration are recommended for universal assay agreement.
More Related Videos
07:08Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
Published on: October 20, 2020
14:45Enumeration of Major Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Populations for Multicenter Clinical Trials Using a Whole Blood Phenotyping Assay
Published on: September 16, 2012
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
Comparison between RL and RC circuits
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids