Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
Published on: August 11, 2023
Off-label use of ceftaroline fosamil: A systematic review
Arianna Pani1, Fabrizio Colombo2, Francesca Agnelli2
1Clinical Pharmacology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Italy; Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Milan Statale, Italy.
Abstract:
Ceftaroline fosamil is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity. It has been approved by the EMA and FDA for the treatment of adults and children with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, ceftaroline fosamil has a broad spectrum of activity, and a good safety and tolerability profile, so is frequently used off-label. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the safety and efficacy of off-label use of ceftaroline. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases (2010-2018) were searched using as the main term ceftaroline fosamil and its synonyms in combination with names of infectious diseases of interest. A total of 21 studies with 1901 patients were included: the most common off-label indications for ceftaroline use were bacteremia (n=595), endocarditis (n=171), osteoarticular infections (n=368), hospital-acquired pneumonia (n=115) and meningitis (n=23). The most common reasons for off-label use were persistent or recurrent infection after standard treatment or non-susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin. Clinical success was evaluated in 933 patients, and 724 (77%) of these reached this positive outcome. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was reported in 11 studies. In 83 (9%) cases there were AEs related to the use of ceftaroline; the most common reported AEs were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash and neutropenia. The review results show that ceftaroline may be used in clinical settings other than those currently approved; however, the use of ceftaroline in these contexts deserves further investigation.
Insights
Ceftaroline fosamil shows promise for off-label infections like bacteremia and osteoarticular infections, with a 77% clinical success rate. While generally safe, adverse events such as rash and neutropenia occurred in 9% of patients.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Ceftaroline fosamil, a fifth-generation cephalosporin, is approved for specific infections but possesses broad-spectrum activity.
- Its favorable safety and tolerability profile encourage off-label utilization in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the safety and efficacy of off-label ceftaroline fosamil use.
- To evaluate clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients treated with ceftaroline for unapproved indications.
Main Methods:
- A PRISMA-guided systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (2010-2018).
- Inclusion of 21 studies involving 1901 patients treated with ceftaroline for various off-label indications.
Main Results:
- Common off-label uses included bacteremia (595 patients), osteoarticular infections (368), and endocarditis (171).
- Reasons for off-label use were often treatment failure or resistance to vancomycin/daptomycin.
- Clinical success was achieved in 77% (724/933) of patients, with adverse events reported in 9% (83/1901).
Conclusions:
- Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrates potential efficacy and acceptable safety in off-label clinical applications.
- Further investigation is warranted to establish definitive guidelines for its expanded use in complex infections.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

