Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
Published on: May 29, 2008
Prognostic models for spinal metastatic disease: evolution of methodologies, limitations, and future opportunities
Aditya V Karhade1, John H Shin2, Joseph H Schwab1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract:
Advances in cancer biology and therapy have increased survival of metastatic disease patients and, in turn, the rates of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Surgery can improve patient quality of life, but accurate estimation of postoperative survival is critical for appropriate patient selection, multidisciplinary management, and shared decision making. Survival estimation on the basis of clinician judgement alone has been shown to be inaccurate and unreliable. Numerous prognostic scoring systems have been developed to address this need but the inputs to these models, the modeling methodologies, and the model outputs have evolved significantly over time. Here we discuss the available scoring systems, existing limitations, and future opportunities.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Convergent Evolution
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Limiting Reactant
Eukaryotic Evolution
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...

