A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Group Psychological First Aid

Area of Science:

• Psychology
• Mental Health
• Trauma Studies

Background:

• Psychological First Aid (PFA) is crucial for mitigating acute distress.
• Evaluating standardized PFA models is essential for effective trauma response.
• Group interventions offer a scalable approach to mental health support.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the efficacy of the Johns Hopkins Rapid PFA model against a group conversation control.
• To assess the impact of RAPID-PFA on state anxiety and affect.
• To determine if RAPID-PFA can mitigate acute distress and instill hope.

Main Methods:

• A randomized controlled trial involving 119 participants.
• Comparison between the Johns Hopkins RAPID-PFA model and a group conversation condition.
• Utilized the State-Trait Anxiety Scale and Positive and Negative Affect Schedules.

Main Results:

• Both groups experienced increased anxiety and negative affect after a distressing video.
• The RAPID-PFA group showed significantly lower state anxiety postintervention and at 30-minute delay.
• RAPID-PFA more effectively lowered negative affect and increased positive affect compared to group conversation.

Conclusions:

• The Johns Hopkins RAPID-PFA model is effective in reducing acute distress.
• RAPID-PFA demonstrates a significant capacity to instill hope.
• Standardized PFA models show promise for widespread mental health support.