Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

10:07
A 5-mC Dot Blot Assay Quantifying the DNA Methylation Level of Chondrocyte Dedifferentiation In Vitro
Published on: May 17, 2017
17.4K
Quantifying error and leakage in an encoded Si/SiGe triple-dot qubit.
Reed W Andrews1, Cody Jones2, Matthew D Reed2
1HRL Laboratories, LLC, Malibu, CA, USA. rwandrews@hrl.com.
Nature Nanotechnology
|July 17, 2019
Summary
We demonstrate a high-fidelity exchange-only qubit using three electron spins in silicon. This novel qubit control uses only voltage pulses, paving the way for scalable quantum computing systems.
Area of Science:
- Quantum computing
- Quantum information science
- Solid-state spin qubits
Background:
- Qubit development faces challenges balancing coherence and control.
- Encoded qubits offer noise resilience and simplified control mechanisms.
- Leakage errors are a key challenge for encoded qubits.
Purpose of the Study:
- Demonstrate high-fidelity operation of an exchange-only qubit.
- Utilize a subsystem of three coupled electron spins in silicon quantum dots.
- Investigate control mechanisms compatible with scalable quantum systems.
Main Methods:
- Encoding a qubit in a three-electron spin subsystem.
- Utilizing gate-voltage-controlled exchange interaction for qubit control.
- Employing a modified blind randomized benchmarking protocol to quantify errors.
Main Results:
- Achieved high-fidelity operation of the exchange-only qubit.
- Demonstrated control exclusively via fast voltage pulses, avoiding high-frequency fields.
- Measured an average total error of 0.35%, with 0.17% attributed to leakage.
Conclusions:
- The exchange-only qubit shows excellent performance and full gate-voltage control.
- This qubit is compatible with low magnetic field environments, aiding integration.
- The demonstrated approach is highly attractive for constructing large-scale quantum processors.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Encoding
770
Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
770
Random Error
9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error
7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K
Contaminants and Errors
351
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
351

