Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 (Dan-NICAD 2): Study design for a controlled study
Laust Dupont Rasmussen1, Simon Winther2, Jelmer Westra2
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Unit West, Gl. Landevej 61, Herning, Denmark.
Insights
The Dan-NICAD 2 study evaluates new methods to improve the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). It aims to optimize risk stratification before coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and compare advanced imaging techniques for more accurate CAD detection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Algorithms
Background:
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is standard for low-to-intermediate risk coronary artery disease (CAD), but its low positive predictive value leads to unnecessary invasive procedures.
- Optimizing diagnostic algorithms can reduce invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) that do not result in revascularization, lowering costs and risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the CADScor®System's diagnostic precision for risk stratification before CTA in patients with suspected CAD.
- To compare the accuracy of 3T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3T CMRI), 82rubidium positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET), and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) against invasive FFR (ICA-FFR).
- To evaluate quantitative flow ratio (QFR) against ICA-FFR using 82Rb-PET as a reference standard.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional Dan-NICAD 2 study enrolling ~2,000 patients with low-to-intermediate pre-test probability of CAD.
- Utilizes coronary CTA, CADScor®System, 3T CMRI, 82Rb-PET, FFR_CT, ICA, and FFR measurements.
- Obstructive CAD defined as FFR ≤0.80 or >90% stenosis; diagnostic performance assessed via sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and discrimination.
Main Results:
- Study results are pending completion of patient enrollment (expected June 2020) and 10-year follow-up.
- The study hypothesizes that CADScor®System improves risk stratification compared to clinical scores alone.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of advanced imaging modalities (3T CMRI, 82Rb-PET, FFR_CT, QFR) against ICA-FFR will be determined.
Conclusions:
- The Dan-NICAD 2 study is expected to refine diagnostic strategies for suspected CAD.
- Findings will inform risk stratification prior to CTA and guide post-CTA diagnostic pathways.
- The study will assess the utility of QFR as a non-invasive alternative to ICA-FFR.
Background:
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the preferred primary diagnostic modality when examining patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). Only 20-30% of these have potentially obstructive CAD. Because of the relatively poor positive predictive value of coronary CTA, unnecessary invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) are conducted with the costs and risks associated with the procedure. Hence, an optimized diagnostic CAD algorithm may reduce the numbers of ICAs not followed by revascularization. The Dan-NICAD 2 study has 3 equivalent main aims: (1) To examine the diagnostic precision of a sound-based diagnostic algorithm, The CADScor®System (Acarix A/S, Denmark), in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test risk of CAD referred to a primary examination by coronary CTA. We hypothesize that the CADScor®System provides better stratification prior to coronary CTA than clinical risk stratification scores alone. (2) To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3T CMRI), 82rubidium positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET), and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in patients where obstructive CAD cannot be ruled out by coronary CTA using ICA fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference standard. (3) To compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and ICA-FFR in patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD using 82Rb-PET as reference standard.
Methods:
Dan-NICAD 2 is a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study including approximately 2,000 patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and without previous history of CAD. Patients are referred to coronary CTA because of symptoms suggestive of CAD, as evaluated by a cardiologist. Patient interviews, sound recordings, and blood samples are obtained in connection with the coronary CTA. If coronary CTA does not rule out obstructive CAD, patients will be examined by 3T CMRI 82Rb-PET, FFRCT, ICA, and FFR. Reference standard is ICA-FFR. Obstructive CAD is defined as an FFR ≤0.80 or as high-grade stenosis (>90% diameter stenosis) by visual assessment. Diagnostic performance will be evaluated as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, calibration, and discrimination. Enrolment started January 2018 and is expected to be completed by June 2020. Patients are followed for 10 years after inclusion.
Discussion:
The results of the Dan-NICAD 2 study are expected to contribute to the improvement of diagnostic strategies for patients suspected of CAD in 3 different steps: risk stratification prior to coronary CTA, diagnostic strategy after coronary CTA, and invasive wireless QFR analysis as an alternative to ICA-FFR.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

