A Comparison Between the Comprehensive Complication Index and the Clavien-Dindo Grading as a Measure of Postoperative...

The Clavien-Dindo (CD) grading system reports the most severe of all the postoperative complications. The comprehensive complication index (CCI) sums up all the complications in postoperative period. We compared the CCI and CD to assess which of the two was a better measure of postoperative outcomes.

Between June 2015 and December 2016, we recorded the complications using CD grading and CCI in 1000 consecutive patients in our gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery unit. The outcome variables studied were postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and time to normal activity. The results were expressed as strength of correlation and predictive accuracy of the outcome variables.

There were 600 males and 400 female patients, with a mean age of 50.3 y. A total of 788 (78.8%) elective and 212(21.2%) emergency procedures were performed. The overall 90-day/in-hospital mortality was 7.9%. Both CD and CCI showed a good correlation with LOS (r = 0.58; P = 0.001, r = 0.57; P = 0.001), ICU stay (r = 0.62; P = 0.002, r = 0.62; P = 0.001), and time to normal activity (r = 0.48; P = 0.01; r = 0.49; P = 0.01). The accuracy of CCI to predict the LOS (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.89; P < 0.001), ICU stay (AUC = 0.85; P < 0.001), and time to normal activity (AUC = 0.76; P < 0.001) was comparable to that of CD (AUC = 0.90; P < 0.001, AUC = 0.87; P < 0.001, AUC = 0.77; P < 0.001).

Both CD and CCI were equally accurate in measuring the postoperative outcomes and in their ability to predict the same in patients undergoing gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeries. Considering the relative ease of determination of CD, it remains a more commonly used measure for assessing the severity of complications and outcomes compared to CCI.