Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.9K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.9K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

10.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
10.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of morphological and pseudo-morphological boundaries on activating embedded words when accessing compounds and pseudo-compounds.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

The influence of prime characteristics in semantic priming.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Early access effects in English compound and pseudo-compound words.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Editorial: Reviews in psychology of language.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Skin conductance response and habituation to emotional facial expressions and words.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Editorial: Reviews in language sciences.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K

Detecting spelling errors in compound and pseudocompound words.

Jenna M Chamberlain1, Christina L Gagné1, Thomas L Spalding1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|July 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Morphemes and pseudomorphemes influence word processing. While compounds are processed faster, pseudocompounds show deficits when spelling errors disrupt their structure, indicating obligatory morphological processing.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
08:54

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds

Published on: February 14, 2018

20.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
08:54

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds

Published on: February 14, 2018

20.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Understanding how morphological structure influences word recognition is crucial for psycholinguistics.
  • Previous research has explored the role of morphemes in reading, but the distinction between true compounds and pseudocompounds requires further investigation.
  • The impact of orthographic errors on morphological processing remains an active area of inquiry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of morphemes and pseudomorphemes on word processing during a spelling error detection task.
  • To determine if morphological processing is an obligatory step in word recognition when orthographic cues suggest structure.
  • To examine how spelling errors at morpheme boundaries affect the processing of compound and pseudocompound words.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments employed a spelling error detection task.
  • Participants processed transparent compound words (e.g., doorbell), pseudocompound words (e.g., carpet), and matched control words (e.g., tomato).
  • Spelling errors (transposed letters) were introduced at morpheme boundaries in compound/pseudocompound words and at equivalent locations in control words.

Main Results:

  • Correctly spelled compound words were processed more efficiently than control words, but this advantage disappeared with errors at the morpheme boundary.
  • Misspelled pseudocompound words showed slower processing compared to controls when errors were introduced at the pseudomorpheme boundary.
  • Findings suggest an obligatory attempt at morphological processing, with differing outcomes for compounds (facilitatory) and pseudocompounds (inhibitory) when orthography is misleading.

Conclusions:

  • Orthographic cues indicating morphological structure trigger obligatory morphological processing.
  • The processing outcome depends on whether the word's actual morphological structure aligns with the orthographically suggested structure.
  • Two distinct effects were observed: a general orthographic facilitation and a morphemic effect that is facilitatory for compounds and inhibitory for pseudocompounds.