Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dimensional Analysis03:40

Dimensional Analysis

59.8K
Dimensional analysis, also known as the factor label method, is a versatile approach for mathematical operations. The main principle behind this approach is: the units of quantities must be subjected to the same mathematical operations as their associated numbers. This method can be applied to computations ranging from simple unit conversions to more complex and multi-step calculations involving several different quantities and their units.
Conversion Factors and Dimensional Analysis
The unit...
59.8K
Dimensional Analysis01:27

Dimensional Analysis

652
Dimensional analysis is a valuable technique in fluid mechanics for simplifying complex problems by reducing them into dimensionless groups. These groups capture the essential relationships between the variables involved, allowing researchers and engineers to analyze fluid flow without dealing with each variable individually. This approach reduces the number of independent variables, allowing for easier analysis and better understanding of physical phenomena.
In fluid mechanics, dimensional...
652
Dimensional Analysis01:23

Dimensional Analysis

2.1K
Dimensional analysis is a powerful tool that is used in physics and engineering to understand and predict the behavior of physical systems. The basic idea behind dimensional analysis is to express physical quantities in terms of fundamental dimensions such as the mass, length, and time. Derived dimensions like the velocity, acceleration, and force are derived from the combinations of these fundamental dimensions.
Dimensional analysis allows us to analyze and compare physical quantities on a...
2.1K
Dimensional Analysis02:19

Dimensional Analysis

23.4K
The concept of dimension is important because every mathematical equation linking physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, implying that mathematical equations must meet the following two rules. The first rule is that, in an equation, the expressions on each side of the equal sign must have the same dimensions. This is fairly intuitive since we can only add or subtract quantities of the same type (dimension). The second rule states that, in an equation, the arguments of any of the...
23.4K
Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis01:08

Problem Solving: Dimensional Analysis

6.0K
Every mathematical equation that connects separate distinct physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, which implies it must abide by two rules. For this reason, the concept of dimension is crucial. The first rule is that an equation's expressions on either side of an equality must have the exact same dimension, i.e., quantities of the same dimension can be added or removed. The second rule stipulates that all popular mathematical functions, such as exponential, logarithmic, and...
6.0K
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain01:29

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain

597
Three-dimensional strain analysis is crucial for understanding how materials deform under stress, particularly in elastic, homogeneous materials. This method employs principal stress axes to simplify complex stress states into more understandable forms. Subjected to stress, a small cubic element within a material either expands or contracts along these axes, transforming into a rectangular parallelepiped. This transformation effectively illustrates the material's deformation. The principal...
597

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mapping the genetic architecture of human cortical expansion and its links to neuropsychiatric disorders.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Gingipains as macromolecular mediators at the periodontal-brain interface: Mechanistic, diagnostic, and therapeutic evidence in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy Translation: Lessons from Early Regulatory Meetings.

Human gene therapy·2026
Same author

Regional sex differences in human cortical anatomy vary in their morphometric bases and overlap with sex chromosomal and gonadal influences.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Gene × sex interactions on cognition in the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort.

Biology of sex differences·2026
Same author

First Revision of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Remethylation Disorders.

Journal of inherited metabolic disease·2026
Same journal

Clinical Manifestation of Congenital Unilateral Lower Lip Palsy: A Study of 111 Patients.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Racial and Regional Differences of the Cheek for Facial Feminization: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

A Comparative Study Between the Modified Septal Extension Graft Based on the L-Strut Septum and the Costal Cartilage Graft Based on an Intact Native Septum in Nasal Plasty.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Does Angular Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus Alter Fracture Patterns Compared With the Modifications of Posnick, Wolford, and Hunsuck/Epker?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Why Straight and Curved Platysma Morphologies May Produce Opposite Clinical Effects?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Does Preoperative Aprepitant Reduce Nausea and Emesis After Orthognathic Surgery?

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

3.6K

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging Systems Using Landmark Analysis.

Denise K Liberton1, Rashmi Mishra1, Margaret Beach1

  • 1National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|July 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Three-dimensional (3D) facial imaging systems produce comparable data, though landmark accuracy varies. The 3dMDface and Vectra H1 systems showed greater similarity than the Planmeca ProFace system, with eye and ear landmarks being less precise.

More Related Videos

Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data
09:37

Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data

Published on: April 26, 2016

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting
04:47

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

3.6K
Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data
09:37

Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data

Published on: April 26, 2016

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting
04:47

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging
  • Anthropometry

Background:

  • Commercial 3D facial imaging systems are prevalent for capturing facial shape data.
  • The comparability of data quality across these diverse 3D imaging systems remains largely unknown.
  • Accurate facial shape data is crucial for various clinical and research applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the error associated with landmark coordinate data from three distinct 3D facial imaging systems.
  • To assess the overall shape and landmark-specific differences among the 3dMDface, Planmeca ProFace, and Vectra H1 systems.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 3D imaging data from ten individuals.
  • Utilized geometric morphometric analysis to evaluate shape and landmark variations.
  • Statistical assessment including ANOVA and covariance matrix analysis for landmark placement variability.

Main Results:

  • No significant overall differences in facial shape or size were detected among the three systems.
  • Identified landmark-specific variations, with 3dMDface and Vectra H1 systems demonstrating higher similarity.
  • Landmarks on the eyes and ears exhibited greater noise and variability across systems.

Conclusions:

  • The 3D facial imaging systems evaluated produce generally comparable data for facial shape analysis.
  • The 3dMDface and Vectra H1 systems offer more consistent landmark data compared to the Planmeca ProFace system.
  • Specific facial regions, particularly eyes and ears, require careful consideration due to increased landmark variability.