Membrane metallo-endopeptidase is dispensable for repair after nerve injury

Ilaria Cervellini1, Jorge Galino1, Ning Zhu1

  • 1The Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Glia
|July 25, 2019
PubMed

Insights

Membrane metallo-endopeptidase (MME) is not essential for nerve repair after injury. MME knockout mice showed normal axon regeneration and remyelination, with altered sensory recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Peripheral Nervous System Research

Background:

  • Membrane metallo-endopeptidase (MME), or neprilysin (NEP), degrades β-amyloid and substance-P, impacting neurodegeneration and pain.
  • MME is present in the peripheral nervous system, and its mutations are linked to Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 2 (CMT2).
  • MME expression is altered after nerve injury, suggesting a potential role in nerve repair.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of MME in remyelination and peripheral nerve regeneration after injury.
  • To determine if MME is essential for functional recovery following nerve damage.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MME knockout (KO) mice and wild-type (WT) littermates.
  • Assessed peripheral nerve morphometry, axon regeneration, and remyelination after induced nerve injury.
  • Evaluated functional motor and sensory recovery, including epidermal reinnervation.

Main Results:

  • MME KO mice showed no impairment in myelination in naive adults.
  • Axon regeneration and remyelination were indistinguishable between MME KO and WT mice post-injury.
  • MME KO mice exhibited earlier recovery of mechanical sensory stimuli response, potentially linked to substance-P modulation.

Conclusions:

  • MME is dispensable for axon regeneration and remyelination following peripheral nerve injury.
  • Dysregulation of MME after nerve injury, though NRG1-dependent, does not affect structural repair.
  • Altered sensory recovery in MME KO mice suggests a role in modulating peptide-mediated sensory signaling.

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
43.5K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
6.3K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
33.5K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
26.1K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
40.6K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.9K