Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Short-term effects of a 3-week interval training program on heart rate variability in chronic heart failure. A
Florent Besnier1, Marc Labrunée2, Lisa Richard3
1Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), UMR-1048, 1, avenue Professeur Jean-Poulhès, BP 84225, 31432, Toulouse, France; ELSAN, Clinic of Saint-Orens, Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Center, 12 avenue de Revel, 31650, Saint-Orens-de-Gameville, France.
Background:
Exaggerated sympathetic nervous system activity associated with low heart rate variability (HRV) is considered to trigger cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death. Regular exercise training is efficient to improve autonomic balance.
Objective:
We aimed to verify the superiority of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to enhance HRV, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiac function as compared with moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) in a short, intense cardiac rehabilitation program.
Methods:
This was a prospective, monocentric, evaluator-blinded, randomised (1:1) study with a parallel two-group design. Overall, 31 individuals with voluntary chronic heart failure (CHF) (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]<45%) were allocated to MICT (n=15) or HIIT (n=16) for a short rehabilitation program (mean [SD] 27 [4] days). Participants underwent 24-hr electrocardiography, echocardiography and a cardiopulmonary exercise test at entry and at the end of the study.
Results:
High-frequency power in normalized units (HFnu%) measured as HRV increased with HIIT (from 21.2% to 26.4%, P<0.001) but remained unchanged with MICT (from 23.1% to 21.9%, P=0.444, with a significant intergroup difference, P=0.003). Resting heart rate (24-hr Holter electrocardiography) decreased significantly for both groups (from 68.2 to 64.6 bpm and 66.0 to 63.5 bpm for MICT and HIIT, respectively, with no intergroup difference, P=0.578). The 2 groups did not differ in premature ventricular contractions. Improvement in peak oxygen uptake was greater with HIIT than MICT (+21% vs. +5%, P=0.009). LVEF improved with only HIIT (from 36.2% to 39.5%, P=0.034).
Conclusions:
In this short rehabilitation program, HIIT was significantly superior to the classical MICT program for enhancing parasympathetic tone and peak oxygen uptake. CLINICALTRIALS.
Gov Identifier:
NCT03603743.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Regulation of Heart Rates
The SNS increases heart rate through the release of norepinephrine and epinephrine, which act on beta-1 adrenergic receptors in the heart. This action increases the rate of depolarization in the sinoatrial (SA) node, the heart's...
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

