Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How Long Is Too Long: An Individual Time-Window for Motor Planning.

Anat Dahan1,2, Rotem Bennet1, Miriam Reiner1

  • 1Department of Education in Science and Technology, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|July 30, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Optimal motor planning time influences human motor response time (RT). Shorter RTs occur with sufficient planning, but excessive planning increases RT, revealing a U-shaped curve and individual optimal planning windows.

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.9K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The fastest among us… The unique capacity of self-control of upper alpha brain oscillations for expedited mental rotation by some individuals.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Stringology-based motif discovery for electrophysiological time series: A framework for temporal pattern analysis with an ADHD case study.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

Correction: Applications of Alpha Neurofeedback Processes for Enhanced Mental Manipulation of Unfamiliar Molecular and Spatial Structures.

Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback·2024
Same author

Personalized rehabilitation approach for reaching movement using reinforcement learning.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Applications of Alpha Neurofeedback Processes for Enhanced Mental Manipulation of Unfamiliar Molecular and Spatial Structures.

Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback·2024
Same author

Using virtual reality to induce multi-trial inattentional blindness despite trial-by-trial measures of awareness.

Behavior research methods·2024

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Human motor response time (RT) is influenced by the neural processes underlying motor planning.
  • Understanding the temporal dynamics of motor planning is crucial for optimizing movement execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between motor planning duration and motor response time.
  • To determine if an optimal planning time exists for minimizing motor RT.
  • To characterize the temporal boundaries of the motor planning process.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a "Timed Response" paradigm to present varying planning intervals before a motor response.
  • Measured motor response times (RTs) across different planning durations.
  • Analyzed the initiation timing of movements following planned intervals.
Keywords:
hippocampusindividual differencesmotor planningoptimal controlplanning interval

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reaction time initially decreased with increased planning time, up to a certain point.
  • Beyond this optimal point, further increases in planning time led to longer motor RTs, demonstrating a U-shaped function.
  • The minimal RT was identified as an individual characteristic.

Conclusions:

  • There is an optimal time window for motor planning that minimizes response time.
  • Motor planning duration significantly impacts motor response time, following a U-shaped behavioral pattern.
  • Individual differences in minimal RT suggest personalized optimal motor planning durations.