Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026
A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: Updates and critical information 2019
, Todd D Greenberg1, Michael N Hoff2
1Private Practice, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract:
The need for a guidance document on MR safe practices arose from a growing awareness of the MR environment's potential risks and adverse event reports involving patients, equipment, and personnel. Initially published in 2002, the American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety established de facto industry standards for safe and responsible practices in clinical and research MR environments. The most recent version addresses new sources of risk of adverse events, increases awareness of dynamic MR environments, and recommends that those responsible for MR medical director safety undergo annual MR safety training. With regular updates to these guidelines, the latest MR safety concerns can be accounted for to ensure a safer MR environment where dangers are minimized. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:331-338.
Insights
This guidance document on Magnetic Resonance (MR) safety provides updated standards to minimize risks in clinical and research environments. Regular updates ensure awareness of new dangers and promote annual safety training for personnel.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging Safety
Background:
- Growing awareness of potential risks and adverse events in Magnetic Resonance (MR) environments.
- The American College of Radiology (ACR) White Paper on MR Safety, first published in 2002, set industry standards.
- Previous guidelines required updates to address evolving risks and dynamic MR environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide updated guidance on MR safe practices.
- To address new sources of risk and increase awareness of dynamic MR environments.
- To ensure a safer MR environment by minimizing dangers through regular guideline updates.
Main Methods:
- Review and update of existing MR safety guidelines.
- Incorporation of new risk factors and dynamic MR environment considerations.
- Recommendation for annual MR safety training for responsible personnel.
Main Results:
- The latest version of the guidance document addresses emerging MR safety concerns.
- Increased awareness of risks associated with dynamic MR environments.
- Establishment of updated standards for safe practices in clinical and research settings.
Conclusions:
- Regular updates to MR safety guidelines are crucial for maintaining a safe environment.
- Annual MR safety training is recommended for personnel overseeing MR safety.
- Adherence to updated guidelines minimizes dangers in MR settings.
Related Concept Videos
01:13SI Units: 2019 Redefinition
A standard set of units has been defined...
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
01:23Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
01:28Formats for Nursing Documentation
Nursing Assessment Form:
• A nursing assessment form is a foundational document that captures detailed patient data from physical assessments and nursing histories.
• It includes patient demographics, medical history,...
01:16Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
01:31Critical Values