Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
Published on: February 7, 2025
The response of the pediatric head to impacts onto a rigid surface
Andre Matthew Loyd1, Roger W Nightingale1, Jason F Luck1
1Duke University Injury Biomechanics Laboratory, United States.
Insights
Pediatric head injury research needs more data. This study found that age and drop height significantly impact head response, with younger children experiencing more severe injuries, including fractures. This data is crucial for validating injury models.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Pediatric Traumatology
- Forensic Science
Background:
- Pediatric head injury research relies on finite element models and anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs).
- Validation of these tools is limited by a lack of pediatric head response data.
- Understanding pediatric head injury tolerance is critical for developing effective safety measures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact response and injury tolerance of the pediatric head.
- To gather crucial data for validating pediatric head injury models.
- To analyze the influence of age and impact parameters on head injury metrics.
Main Methods:
- Twelve pediatric cadaveric heads (33 weeks gestation to 16 years) were subjected to drop tests.
- Impacts were delivered to five locations from 15 cm and 30 cm drop heights.
- Head acceleration, Head Injury Criterion (HIC), impact force, and pulse duration were measured.
Main Results:
- Age and drop height were significant factors influencing pediatric head response.
- Head acceleration, HIC, and impact stiffness increased with age and drop height.
- Younger pediatric heads (5-22 months) sustained fractures, including linear and diastatic fractures, at tested drop heights.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric head response to impact is highly dependent on age and impact severity.
- Younger pediatric heads exhibit increased vulnerability to fractures.
- The data provides essential insights for improving pediatric head injury prevention and modeling.
Abstract:
The study of pediatric head injury relies heavily on the use of finite element models and child anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). However, these tools, in the context of pediatric head injury, have yet to be validated due to a paucity of pediatric head response data. The goal of this study is to investigate the response and injury tolerance of the pediatric head to impact. Twelve pediatric heads were impacted in a series of drop tests. The heads were dropped onto five impact locations (forehead, occiput, vertex and right and left parietal) from drop heights of 15 and 30 cm. The head could freely fall without rotation onto a flat 19 mm thick platen. The impact force was measured using a 3-axis piezoelectric load cell attached to the platen. Age and drop height were found to be significant factors in the impact response of the pediatric head. The head acceleration (14%-15 cm; 103-30 cm), Head Injury Criterion (HIC) (253%-15 cm; 154%-30 cm) and impact stiffness (5800%-15 cm; 3755%-30 cm) when averaged across all impact locations increased with age from 33 weeks gestation to 16 years, while the pulse duration (66%-15 cm; 53%-30 cm) decreased with age. Increases in head acceleration, HIC and impact stiffness were also observed with increased drop height, while pulse duration decreased with increased drop height. One important observation was that three of the four cadaveric heads between the ages of 5-months and 22-months sustained fractures from the 15 cm and 30 cm drop heights. The 5-month-old sustained a right parietal linear fracture while the 11- and 22-month-old sustained diastatic linear fractures.
More Related Videos
07:02An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
Published on: January 12, 2011
06:14In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data
Published on: April 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body
Equation of Motion for a Rigid Body
The combined moments generated about the center of mass of the object are equal to the rate of change of the angular momentum of the body. An external force, when applied at a different...
Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies
Next,...