Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Goal directed fluid therapy for major liver resection: A multicentre randomized controlled trial
Laurence Weinberg1, Damian Ianno2, Leonid Churilov3,4
1Director of Anesthesia, Austin Hospital; and A/Professor, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
A restrictive fluid optimization algorithm combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) did not significantly reduce hospital stay or complications in liver resection patients. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Area of Science:
- Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Critical Care Medicine
- Perioperative Fluid Management
Background:
- The impact of restrictive goal-directed therapy (GDT) fluid protocols combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on hospital stay after major liver resection remains unclear.
- Optimizing fluid management is crucial in major abdominal surgeries to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a patient-specific, surgery-specific intraoperative restrictive fluid optimization algorithm can reduce hospital stay and perioperative fluid-related complications.
- To assess the efficacy of a restrictive fluid protocol within an ERAS framework for major liver resection patients.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter randomized controlled pilot trial was conducted.
- Participants were assigned to either a restrictive fluid optimization algorithm group or a conventional care group.
- Intraoperative fluid balances and volumes were meticulously recorded.
Main Results:
- Forty-eight participants were enrolled; no statistically significant difference in median hospital stay was observed between groups (7.0 vs. 8.0 days).
- The restrictive group exhibited lower intraoperative fluid balances (808 mL vs. 1345 mL) and received less fluid per kg/hour (4.3 mL/kg/hr vs. 6.0 mL/kg/hr).
- No significant differences in complications or need for vasoactive drugs were found between the groups.
Conclusions:
- In high-volume hepatobiliary centers, adding a fluid restrictive cardiac output-guided algorithm to a standard ERAS protocol did not significantly decrease hospital stay or fluid-related complications.
- The study's findings are hypothesis-generating, suggesting a larger confirmatory trial may be beneficial.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
The Fluid Mosaic Model
Random Error

