Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Applications of RNA Interference in American Cockroach
Published on: December 17, 2021
New American and European Hypertension Guidelines, Reconciling the Differences
1Hypertension Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. adelasierra@mutuaterrassa.cat.
Insights
New hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association differ significantly from European recommendations, particularly in defining high blood pressure (hypertension) and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Public Health
Background:
- The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) released new hypertension guidelines in 2017.
- These guidelines replaced the Joint National Committee (JNC) reports, last updated in 2003.
- The European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) updated their guidelines in 2018.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the main differences between the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH hypertension guidelines.
- To analyze the arguments supporting the divergent recommendations.
- To discuss the potential impact on clinical hypertension management.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH hypertension guidelines.
- Review of expert arguments and rationale for guideline discrepancies.
- Discussion of clinical implications for hypertension detection, diagnosis, and treatment.
Main Results:
- The ACC/AHA guidelines introduce a disruptive new definition of hypertension, lowering the threshold to 130/80 mmHg.
- This change impacts hypertension prevalence and alters therapeutic strategies, including treatment initiation and blood pressure targets.
- While European guidelines show minimal changes, American proposals represent a significant shift.
Conclusions:
- The divergent hypertension guidelines present distinct approaches to diagnosis and therapy.
- The new American definition and treatment recommendations may significantly alter clinical practice.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for effective hypertension management globally.
Abstract:
In November 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released hypertension guidelines for the first time, replacing the Joint National Committee periodical reports, appearing from 1977 to 2003. In parallel, the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension updated their own recommendations with a new document released in August 2018. While both documents contain similar recommendations concerning several aspects of detection, prevention, and management of hypertension, they differ in some sensitive characteristics, which specifically affect diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. While the European guidelines do not substantially modify previous recommendations, the American proposals are clearly disruptive. Main examples include a new definition for hypertension, with a blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg. Not only does it modify its prevalence, but also carries important changes in therapeutic aspects, including treatment initiation and blood pressure goals for treated patients. In this review, the main differences between American and European recommendations are highlighted, along with the arguments exposed by both groups of experts and their possible impact affecting clinical practice in hypertension management.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

