Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Constructing Cyclic Peptides Using an On-Tether Sulfonium Center
Published on: September 28, 2022
Iron Complexes for Cyclic Carbonate and Polycarbonate Formation: Selectivity Control from Ligand Design and
Kori A Andrea1, Erika D Butler1, Tyler R Brown1
1Department of Chemistry , Memorial University of Newfoundland , St. John's , Newfoundland A1B 3X7 , Canada.
Abstract:
A family of 17 iron(III) aminobis(phenolate) complexes possessing different phenolate substituents, coordination geometries, and donor arrangements were used as catalysts for the reaction of carbon dioxide (CO2) with epoxides. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of the iron complexes with a bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium chloride cocatalyst in negative mode revealed the formation of six-coordinate iron "ate" species. Under low catalyst loadings (0.025 mol % Fe and 0.1 mol % chloride cocatalyst), all complexes showed good-to-excellent activity for converting propylene oxide to propylene carbonate under 20 bar of CO2. The most active complex possessed electron-withdrawing dichlorophenolate groups and for a 2 h reaction time gave a turnover frequency of 1240 h-1. Epichlorohydrin, styrene oxide, phenyl glycidyl ether, and allyl glycidyl ether could also be transformed to their respective cyclic carbonates with good-to-excellent conversions. Selectivity for polycarbonate formation was observed using cyclohexene oxide, where the best activity was displayed by trigonal-bipyramidal iron(III) complexes having electron-rich phenolate groups and sterically unencumbering tertiary amino donors. Those containing bulky tertiary amino ligands or those with square-pyramidal geometries around iron showed no activity for polycarbonate formation. While the overall conversions declined with decreasing CO2 pressure, CO2 incorporation remained high, giving a completely alternating copolymer. The difference in the optimum catalyst reactivity for cyclic carbonate versus polycarbonate formation is particularly noteworthy; that is, electron-withdrawing-group-containing phenolates give the most active catalysts for propylene carbonate formation, whereas catalysts with electron-donating-group-containing phenolates are the most active for polycyclohexene carbonate formation. This study demonstrates that the highly modifiable aminophenolate ligands can be tailored to yield iron complexes for both CO2/epoxide coupling and ring-opening copolymerization activity.
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Coordination Number and Geometry
Formation of Complex Ions
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Brainstem: Control Centers of Medulla
Olivary Nucleus
The olivary nucleus, or inferior olivary nucleus, is located within the ventrolateral part of the medulla oblongata. It is primarily involved in motor coordination and motor learning. The olivary nucleus receives input from the spinal cord, cerebellum, and motor...
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...

