Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Improving patient access through office hysteroscopy clinic redesign
Jenna N Wygant1, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso, Isabel C Green
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
This study examined a new way to improve patient access to hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Before the change, patients often needed multiple visits to see a nurse practitioner and a gynecologist separately. The new model combined these visits into one appointment, allowing for same-day hysteroscopy when needed. The study found that this approach significantly reduced wait times and increased clinic efficiency. Nurse practitioners managed diagnostic evaluations and bleeding treatment when hysteroscopy was not needed. The model improved access without affecting no-show or fill rates. The authors suggest that integrating diagnostic and procedural visits can enhance patient care efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic diagnostic procedures
- Healthcare system efficiency
- Primary care and specialty collaboration
Background:
Healthcare systems often struggle to balance patient access with procedural efficiency. Established knowledge shows that diagnostic delays can worsen patient outcomes. Prior research has shown that separate scheduling of diagnostic and procedural appointments increases wait times. This gap motivated the need for a streamlined approach in gynecologic care. No prior work had resolved the inefficiencies caused by separate NP and specialist visits. This paper's contribution lies in addressing the workflow of hysteroscopy scheduling. The study focuses on abnormal uterine bleeding as a common diagnostic need. It introduces a model that integrates diagnostic and procedural appointments.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to improve patient access by redesigning the workflow for office hysteroscopy. The specific problem was the inefficiency of separate diagnostic and procedural appointments. The motivation was to reduce wait times for hysteroscopy services. The goal was to evaluate a new clinic model involving nurse practitioners and gynecologists. The approach involved scheduling consecutive visits with both providers. The study sought to measure the impact on appointment wait times and clinic efficiency. The focus was on patients with abnormal uterine bleeding requiring hysteroscopy. The study aimed to test whether a collaborative model could enhance access.
Main Methods:
The study implemented a new clinic model combining diagnostic and procedural visits. Nurse practitioners evaluated patients with abnormal uterine bleeding first. Gynecologists followed immediately for hysteroscopy if indicated. The model allowed for same-day procedural appointments when needed. Electronic records were used to track patient scheduling data. Preintervention data came from 393 patients seen from January to June 2015. Postintervention data included 647 patients from January to June 2016. The study compared wait times and clinic efficiency before and after the redesign.
Main Results:
Postintervention data showed a significant reduction in wait times for hysteroscopy appointments. Sixty-three percent of patients were scheduled within 0-13 days compared to 30% preintervention. The redesigned clinic increased available appointment slots by 57.5%. No-show rates remained stable before and after the intervention. Appointment fill rates were not negatively impacted by the new model. Nurse practitioners managed non-hysteroscopy cases efficiently. Gynecologists performed hysteroscopy during the same visit when indicated. The model improved access without compromising patient follow-up.
Conclusions:
The collaborative model improved access to office hysteroscopy services as reported by the authors. The study suggests that integrating NP and gynecologist visits reduces wait times. The authors propose that this model enhances clinic efficiency without adverse effects. No-show rates and fill rates remained unchanged as stated in the abstract. The model allowed for same-day scheduling when hysteroscopy was indicated. Nurse practitioners managed non-procedural cases effectively as noted. The study concludes that a team-based approach improves patient access. The findings suggest that workflow redesign can enhance diagnostic efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
The redesign combined diagnostic and procedural visits, reducing wait times from 30% to 63% within 0-13 days.
Nurse practitioners evaluated patients first, managing non-procedural cases and scheduling hysteroscopy as needed.
The model reduced wait times and improved efficiency by allowing same-day procedural appointments when indicated.
Success was measured by comparing wait times, appointment slots, and no-show rates before and after the redesign.
The clinic increased available appointment slots by 57.5% without affecting no-show or fill rates.
The authors suggest that a team-based model improves access to diagnostic procedures without compromising follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Clinical Trials: Overview
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...

