Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

A Mobile Outside-in Technique of Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopy for Lumbar Disc Herniations
Published on: August 7, 2018
Limited versus Aggressive Open Discectomy for a Single Level Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Prolapse
M K Ahsan1, S I Khan, M M Tarik
1Dr Md Kamrul Ahsan, Associate Professor of Spinal surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh;
Limited lumbar discectomy offers comparable outcomes to aggressive discectomy for disc herniation, with better patient satisfaction and reduced operative time. Both methods achieve satisfactory results, making limited discectomy a viable alternative.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Spinal Surgery
Background:
- Open lumbar discectomy is the standard surgical treatment for intervertebral disc herniation.
- Debate exists regarding whether limited or aggressive open discectomy yields superior clinical outcomes.
- Comparative studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different discectomy approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, and recurrence rates between limited discectomy (LD) and aggressive open discectomy (AD).
- To assess patient satisfaction and identify potential advantages of each surgical technique.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 2380 patients who underwent either limited or aggressive open discectomy.
- Data collected included demographics, surgical details, complications, and re-herniation rates.
- Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified McNab criteria.
Main Results:
- Limited discectomy demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (55 vs. 95 minutes) and reduced analgesic use compared to aggressive discectomy.
- Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the limited discectomy group.
- No significant differences were observed in low back pain, leg pain, recurrence rates, infection, blood loss, or hospitalization duration between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Limited lumbar discectomy is a safe and effective alternative to aggressive open discectomy for treating intervertebral disc herniation.
- Both surgical approaches result in satisfactory clinical outcomes, with limited discectomy offering improved patient satisfaction and efficiency.
- The choice between limited and aggressive discectomy may depend on patient-specific factors and surgeon preference, considering the comparable efficacy in key clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
Limiting Reactant
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
The Number e as a Limit
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

