Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative psychoacoustics.

R R Fay1

  • 1Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Illinois 60626.

Hearing Research
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares mammal hearing abilities to humans using psychophysical data. Mammalian auditory functions are qualitatively similar to humans, though human hearing is generally more acute.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Directional selectivity and frequency tuning of midbrain cells in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2003
Same author

Directionality and frequency tuning of primary saccular afferents of a vocal fish, the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus).

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2002
Same author

Neural representations of the axis of acoustic particle motion in nucleus centralis of the torus semicircularis of the goldfish, Carassius auratus.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2002
Same author

Spectral contrasts underlying auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2001
Same author

Directional encoding by fish auditory systems.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2000
Same author

Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing.

Hearing research·2000
Same journal

Effects of early hearing deficits on olivocochlear efferent neuron morphology in mice.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Repopulating microglia recapitulate developmental characteristics during a period of auditory circuit recovery.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Deficits in tail-lift and air-righting reflexes in rats after ototoxicity associate with loss of vestibular type I hair cells.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Slc16a5 (MCT6) knockout induces sex-dependent changes in auditory function, hair cell viability and cochlear transcriptomic programs in the mouse.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Comparative Psychoacoustics
  • Mammalian Hearing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory perception in mammals is crucial for auditory research.
  • Existing literature provides psychophysical data for various non-human species.
  • Direct comparisons of auditory capacities between humans and mammals are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compile and compare psychophysical data of commonly researched mammals with human hearing capacities.
  • To identify similarities and differences in auditory functions across species.
  • To assess the current state of data for systematic cross-species comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of psychophysical data from unspecialized mammals.
  • Compilation of audiograms, discrimination thresholds, and other auditory functions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative comparison of psychoacoustic functions between selected mammals and humans.

    • Main Results:

    • Psychoacoustic data are most complete for chinchilla, cat, primates, and mouse.
    • Qualitative forms of most psychoacoustic functions are similar in mammals and humans.
    • Human discriminative capacities are generally more acute than those of non-humans.

    Conclusions:

    • Mammalian and human auditory mechanisms are likely similar.
    • Current data are insufficient for confident, systematic cross-species comparisons.
    • Further research is needed to refine our understanding of mammalian hearing.