Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.5K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.9K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.9K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When is "now"? In the past to compensate for the sensation of time or in the future as a prediction of the temporal sensory horizon?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias that favors prior-congruent evidence.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Introducing Philosophy Corner.

Perception·2025
Same author

Are you a perception scientist?

Perception·2025
Same author

Perceiving gloss through transparency.

i-Perception·2025
Same journal

Integrated multi-assessment and structural performance index framework for stacking-sequence optimisation of natural fibre reinforced laminates.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

SuperiorGAT: graph attention networks for sparse LiDAR point cloud reconstruction in autonomous systems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

The effect of stretching the pectoralis major, sternocleidomastoid, and iliopsoas muscles on 800 m swimming performance in master swimmers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

ISNR-PQC: isometry noise resilience post quantum cryptography primitive.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Identification of high-yielding and stable genotypes of barley in the cold climate of Iran using AMMI and GGE biplot models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Bayesian negative binomial modelling of spatial and temporal patterns of road traffic deaths in Ghana.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Temporal attention causes systematic biases in visual confidence.

Samuel Recht1, Pascal Mamassian2, Vincent de Gardelle3

  • 1Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, Département d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, 75005, Paris, France. samuel.recht@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|August 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Confidence in perception is limited by temporal attention. This study shows that confidence judgments do not fully capture the limitations of temporal attention, especially when processing multiple targets.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K
Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K
Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Temporal attention selectively enhances stimulus representation over time.
  • The capacity for attentional episodes is finite, but its impact on observer confidence remains poorly understood.
  • Understanding confidence limitations is crucial for accurate perceptual modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether observer confidence reflects the limitations imposed by temporal attention.
  • To examine how confidence judgments are affected by the attentional blink phenomenon.
  • To determine if confidence accurately tracks perceptual evidence and response selection under temporal constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted the attentional blink paradigm using a rapid visual stream of letters.
  • Presented two targets requiring perceptual reports and confidence judgments.
  • Analyzed the relationship between target processing, confidence, and response accuracy.

Main Results:

  • A significant under-confidence bias was observed for the second target within a single attentional episode.
  • Confidence strongly correlated with response probability, despite the under-confidence bias.
  • Confidence failed to account for response selection delays, leading to misattributions of confidence to incorrect items.

Conclusions:

  • Observer confidence does not perfectly reflect the constraints of temporal attention in demanding perceptual tasks.
  • Confidence judgments may be influenced by factors other than the precise evaluation of attentional limitations.
  • These findings highlight a dissociation between subjective confidence and objective performance under attentional load.