Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Single-case Design Studies in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review
Laura W M E Beckers1,2, Rosalinde A Stal3, Rob J E M Smeets1,4
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Insights
Single-case design (SCD) studies in children with cerebral palsy (CP) show high risk of bias and insufficient reporting. Improving methodological quality is crucial for reliable evidence in CP research.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Rehabilitation
- Neurology
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Cerebral palsy (CP) affects children and adolescents, necessitating effective interventions.
- Single-case designs (SCDs) are utilized to evaluate interventions in this population.
- Critical evaluation of existing SCD studies is needed to assess evidence quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate single-case design (SCD) studies involving children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).
- To assess the methodological quality and reporting standards of SCD research in CP.
- To identify strengths, limitations, and areas for improvement in SCD studies for CP.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a scoping review of SCD studies focusing on pediatric CP populations.
- Extracted demographic, methodological, and statistical data from selected studies.
- Evaluated study quality using the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale and CENT 2015 criteria.
Main Results:
- A broad range of interventions and outcomes were investigated across various SCD types.
- Studies predominantly used visual inspection for data analysis, with limited statistical approaches.
- High risk of bias, particularly in internal validity, and insufficient reporting of CONSORT extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) items were prevalent.
Conclusions:
- The current quality of evidence from SCD studies in pediatric CP requires enhancement.
- Reducing risk of bias and improving adherence to reporting guidelines are essential.
- Further research should focus on strengthening the methodological rigor of SCDs in CP.
Abstract:
Aim: To critically evaluate single-case design (SCD) studies performed within the population of children/adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods: A scoping review of SCD studies of children/adolescents with CP. Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted. Articles were evaluated using the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT 2015). Comments regarding strengths and limitations were analyzed.Results: Studies investigated the effects of a wide range of interventions on various outcomes. Most SCD types were adopted in multiple studies. All studies used visual inspection rather than visual analysis, often complemented with basic statistical descriptives. Risk of bias was high, particularly concerning internal validity. Many CENT items were insufficiently reported. Several benefits and limitations of SCD were identified.Conclusions: The quality of evidence from results of SCD studies needs to be increased through risk of bias reduction.
More Related Videos
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
08:24Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Massage Therapy in Cerebral Palsy Using Animal Models
Published on: August 11, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
The Scope of Physics
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...