Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlined Brain and Skull Modeling for Enhanced Neurosurgical Planning in NHP Research
Published on: February 9, 2024
Comparison between different screening strategies to determine the statistical shape model of the pelvises for
Kao-Shang Shih1, Chi-Pin Hsu2, Che-Wei Liu3
1School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background And Objectives:
The statistical shape model (SSM) of numerous bones has been used to determine the anatomical representative of the population- or race-specific design for periarticular implants. Whether to include size- and profile-mismatched bones in the SSM calculation is debatable. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the screening strategies for the mismatched bones to improve the SSM calculation.
Methods:
The bone database used in this study consisted of 20 pelvises. A systematic four-staged SSM calculation was used to evaluate the accuracy of the predicted SSM shape among the four size- and profile-screening strategies. Additionally, the surface-smoothing effects on the SSM results were investigated. Two comparison indices were used in terms of profile difference and surface smoothness.
Results:
Significant variations in size and profile existed for the collected bones. By normalizing the aspect ratio of all bones, exclusion of the size-mismatched bones reduced the maximum and root mean square (RMS) error values of the profile difference by 18.9% and 17.5%, respectively. After further excluding the profile-improper bones, normalization reduced the RMS profile difference by 24.1% compared with the non-normalized strategy. Exclusion of the size-improper bones for non-normalized strategy would have reduced the RMS profile difference by 15.4%. After smoothness, the RMS profile difference of SSM was only 6.1% higher than that of the non-smoothness SSM.
Conclusions:
The four-stage calculation showed that the most favorable strategy was to normalize bones to the same aspect ratio and exclude improperly shaped bones. The model permitted inclusion of the original characteristics of the bones and preserved their shapes and excluded only significantly improper bones. After SSM calculation, the smoothed process provided satisfaction in quality with a statistically insignificant loss in bone morphology for population- or race-specific designs of implants.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Statistical Significance
Factorial Design
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
Molecular Shape and Polarity

