A comparative study of topical cantharidin and intralesional PPD to treat molluscum contagiosum
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
Published on: July 5, 2024
Fathia M Khattab1, Mohamed M Nasr1
1Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology and Departments, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Background: The immune system plays an important part in the clearance of molluscum contagiosum (MC) and, therefore, there has lately been a trend in using immunotherapy in MC therapy. Tuberculin-purified protein derivatives (PPDs) and topical cantharidin have not earlier been compared with their effectiveness in therapyAim: The aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness and security of intralesional immunotherapy in the therapy of MC with tuberculin PPD versus topical cantharidinPatients and methods: Twenty patients with various MC lesions received topical cantharidin as control (group A) and 20 MC patients received intralesional tuberculin PPD following prior intradermal immunity tests (group B).Results: Complete clearance of lesions was detected in 90.0% of patients in the cantharidin group; the partial response was detected in10.0% of the patients. However, in the PPD group, 85% of the patients showed a complete response and 15% showed a partial response, with no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups. Mild side effects were detected.Conclusion: The results suggest that intralesional PPD and topical cantharidin 0.7% are effective and safe treatment modalities, but benefits of intralesional PPD is being a simple, effective and safe treatment with tolerable pain and can be an alternative treatment for multiple resistant types.
Background: The immune system plays an important part in the clearance of molluscum contagiosum (MC) and, therefore, there has lately been a trend in using immunotherapy in MC therapy. Tuberculin-purified protein derivatives (PPDs) and topical cantharidin have not earlier been compared with their effectiveness in therapyAim: The aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness and security of intralesional immunotherapy in the therapy of MC with tuberculin PPD versus topical cantharidinPatients and methods: Twenty patients with various MC lesions received topical cantharidin as control (group A) and 20 MC patients received intralesional tuberculin PPD following prior intradermal immunity tests (group B).Results: Complete clearance of lesions was detected in 90.0% of patients in the cantharidin group; the partial response was detected in10.0% of the patients. However, in the PPD group, 85% of the patients showed a complete response and 15% showed a partial response, with no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups. Mild side effects were detected.Conclusion: The results suggest that intralesional PPD and topical cantharidin 0.7% are effective and safe treatment modalities, but benefits of intralesional PPD is being a simple, effective and safe treatment with tolerable pain and can be an alternative treatment for multiple resistant types.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
Comparing Intermolecular Forces: Melting Point, Boiling Point, and Miscibility
Temporary attractive forces like dispersion are present in all molecules, whether they are polar or nonpolar. They...

